There has been a common theme here, in which the top post in this sub have a bountiful amount of comments accusing and insinuating the op is a shill. It's honestly been going on for quite some time but has gotten to the point that you can read a post full of legitimate information and leads, and before you get 5 comments in someone is calling the op a shill. I firmly believe that the opposition is working overtime to discredit this sub and the hard work and research being done here. It might not be a bad idea to take note of those calling people shills for posting legitimate research and findings.
view the rest of the comments →
anonymousgate ago
I swear, it feels like a game of "town of salem."
Anyone who is coming out and saying OMG THIS IS 100% BULLSHIT right away is suspicious. Anyone who is giving clear and well thought out responses that offer room for discussion, is likely not a shill. If something seems fake, calmly and evenhandedly provide reasoning for why you think so. I think as long as WE all stick to thinking clearly and providing solid reasoning when we have disagreements, it should be clear who is a shill and who isn't.
altpizza ago
There is an agenda here.
The NYT hit piece on Pizzagate was CTR, that our investigation is a witch-hunt, that Clinton is a witch, and that CPP was HQ for witches. Stupid fucking shit.
Yet, the MODS keep exactly this narrative going here, and ban any other thread.
We all agreed ( at one time ) that FBIanon was key to all, that he was 100% correct, but now in the past 24 hours the MODS are saying that FBIanon was a shill and that the saying that "UK & SAUDI" are involved in child sex slavery is anti-semitic.
Only a blue-pill clone would NOT see what they're doing here.
UglyTruth ago
Why should anyone believe that?
reasonedandinformed ago
@altpizza is a shill. When you see something confusing, dig into the poster's history. It usually clarifies the questions.