You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

VieBleu ago

From what 1 commentor wrote to me, yes, but take that for what it is worth. archive.is is being recommended

norobotono ago

Wikipedia says

"Unlike crawlers such as Wayback Machine, archive.is only captures individual pages in response to explicit user requests, and so does not obey the robots exclusion standard.[6] Because of this, website owners cannot unilaterally remove content at will, thus it is a "permanent" archive"

On the one hand this is good and allows pages to be shown that crawlers cannot find with robot.txt blocking them, but it's downside is that it only archives what people put there.

If damning pages start being removed from archive.org then there is no way to duplicate them to archive.is.

For now, people would be advised to duplicate any page found on the web or on archive.org to archive.is to be on the safe side.