all he was doing, was posing questions. he did not even allege anything! and they ban him. oh my, they really are intent upon exposing themselves for all the world to see. Nonetheless, I think this man has the right idea. Maybe why he was banned? By putting things as questions, they have more impact. If we go, and say things all passionately, they may use it against us. The more objective we get, the more the facts, can speak for themselves, and people will of course hear the truth eventually. Our misconduct at this stage, could be the only strand they have to cling to. Most people have been great the whole time ,and shown more decorum than professional investigators. Comet has had to invent animosity. The threats that comet pizza says they have received, I believe are mostly made up, or extremely exaggerated. ie a person rings up besta pizza and asks why they changed the logo -mark that up as a threat. A few questions, should not threaten anyone. They wouldn't! Only someone caught out, at a serious crime, suddenly finds questions, an attack and harassing... innocent people are glad of being asked, and will take the opportunity to allay any concerns. Kind of like, Alefantis pretended to be, in that first video, but instead of a few minutes, gloss over, a full interview, that really adresses the concermns. Actually, in that video, and others, Alefantis has only raised more concerns... An innocent person, would not pretend they do not to have basement, they would not say they have never met Clinton, when obviously they have, as she has been there many times. An innocent person would not hide, and avoid questions, and say they feel terrorised. James Alefantis, does not look an innocent person. He is the one of the most guilty looking people, I have ever seen. His behaviour is an embedded confession. His contradictions are an embedded confession. And he is being protected, by members of a govenment that claims to be for the people, but seems determined now, to reveal, that it works, for the elite one percent. A press the claims to be there for the people, but is now just saying what these one percent tell them to.
If government really were for the people, we would live in paradise. They would grow trees everywhere, and source free power from the sun wind and water. They would not milk people dry, but invest in them, and only feel prosperous, when they see all people prospering. They certainly would not sit idly by while children go missing. They would make it the highest priority. Instead we are seeing the opposite. All the most important areas of our lives, are coming under increased threat. Perhaps that is what it will take, for us to wake up, and recognise these elements that have been our overall undoing. They are not hard to see, when looking ... I believe a simple answer to this situation, would be polygraph tests. Done on camera and with independent verification. I am going to look into this, because all this speculation could be put to rest, with an answer to just a few questions. The people who are in suspicion, can simply take them and we will know, by the truthfulness of their answer. if Arun Rao, Tamera Luzzatto, John Podesta, Clinton, James Alefantis, and others, have never killed or traffficked or sexually abused children, let them say so, and then a good many of us, might actually believe them. Why let so many people go on worrying about this if you are innocent and could show it? why?
view the rest of the comments →
YouaremeandIamyou ago
all he was doing, was posing questions. he did not even allege anything! and they ban him. oh my, they really are intent upon exposing themselves for all the world to see. Nonetheless, I think this man has the right idea. Maybe why he was banned? By putting things as questions, they have more impact. If we go, and say things all passionately, they may use it against us. The more objective we get, the more the facts, can speak for themselves, and people will of course hear the truth eventually. Our misconduct at this stage, could be the only strand they have to cling to. Most people have been great the whole time ,and shown more decorum than professional investigators. Comet has had to invent animosity. The threats that comet pizza says they have received, I believe are mostly made up, or extremely exaggerated. ie a person rings up besta pizza and asks why they changed the logo -mark that up as a threat. A few questions, should not threaten anyone. They wouldn't! Only someone caught out, at a serious crime, suddenly finds questions, an attack and harassing... innocent people are glad of being asked, and will take the opportunity to allay any concerns. Kind of like, Alefantis pretended to be, in that first video, but instead of a few minutes, gloss over, a full interview, that really adresses the concermns. Actually, in that video, and others, Alefantis has only raised more concerns... An innocent person, would not pretend they do not to have basement, they would not say they have never met Clinton, when obviously they have, as she has been there many times. An innocent person would not hide, and avoid questions, and say they feel terrorised. James Alefantis, does not look an innocent person. He is the one of the most guilty looking people, I have ever seen. His behaviour is an embedded confession. His contradictions are an embedded confession. And he is being protected, by members of a govenment that claims to be for the people, but seems determined now, to reveal, that it works, for the elite one percent. A press the claims to be there for the people, but is now just saying what these one percent tell them to.
If government really were for the people, we would live in paradise. They would grow trees everywhere, and source free power from the sun wind and water. They would not milk people dry, but invest in them, and only feel prosperous, when they see all people prospering. They certainly would not sit idly by while children go missing. They would make it the highest priority. Instead we are seeing the opposite. All the most important areas of our lives, are coming under increased threat. Perhaps that is what it will take, for us to wake up, and recognise these elements that have been our overall undoing. They are not hard to see, when looking ... I believe a simple answer to this situation, would be polygraph tests. Done on camera and with independent verification. I am going to look into this, because all this speculation could be put to rest, with an answer to just a few questions. The people who are in suspicion, can simply take them and we will know, by the truthfulness of their answer. if Arun Rao, Tamera Luzzatto, John Podesta, Clinton, James Alefantis, and others, have never killed or traffficked or sexually abused children, let them say so, and then a good many of us, might actually believe them. Why let so many people go on worrying about this if you are innocent and could show it? why?