I've been following some leads on this in the dark web discussions and it seems that there's a divide between pedos.
1 "lovers of children" speaks against abuse (but not having sex if "consentual") tries to promote it as a sexual preference like hetero- or homosexuality, opposes strongly group 2. Is ready to support total abstinence from active measures if those hurt children.
2 "friends of children" advocates hurting, raping, fantasizes and advocates abduction, torture and killing, laughs at group 1 makes money out of children and is involved in organized crime way
Have you guys noticed this divide?
Left and right of pedos?
view the rest of the comments →
Wahaha ago
Like the "divide" between normal people and rapists/sex traffickers?
Heffter ago
Yeah, pretty much. But in this case the "normal people" pedos are not seen that much normal by the majority of people.
Children are sexual, just go to any mumboard and read the "my 6mo toddler masturbates omg was she molested what shall I do now" threads and you see the amount of ignorance of most people, usually bible thumping moralists, on what is normal behavior. I know for a fact that toddlers masturbate to orgasm without any outside assistance or info input.
Some people see this as healthy and guide he children to do it privately, others make them feel bad and dirty about it.
What I said above is used by pedos to advocate their own lusts, but is a scientifically solid phenomena.
Norms enjoying sex and rapists on their power trips, yeah I can see an analogy there.
Some think that there is a risk of group 1 pedos switching to group 2 as they are demonized anyway. I'm on the fence whether group 1 pedos should be tolerated at all or not. Just don't know enough what really is damaging sexwise to underage children. I'm no scientist. But totally against rape and violence against anyone.
I think the intention is good (child protection) but age limits are placed arbitrarily, as there are cultures or were at least were underage sexuality wasn't a taboo, like in Hawaii and Polynesian islands and studies showed no negative impact learning it early... maybe it's just culture.
Piscina ago
It's one thing for children to masturbate--which they do. It's another for an adult to take advantage of a child's innocence and inability to consent. There are laws in place exactly because children do not have the wherewithal to consent. There is a multitude of studies that show the harm done to children who have been exploited and sexually abused. If an adult does ANYTHING sexual with a child, it is simply wrong. The child will grow up with issues, and they do. They don't grow up with mental health issues--anxiety, depression, dissociative disorder, etc--because there is a taboo; they grow up with mental health issues because their boundaries have been encroached upon in the most heinous of ways. If you haven't noticed, there is a push (and it seems to be coming from Washington and the UK) to normalise paedophilia; to feel sorry for the poor men who are attracted to children. They are lecherous, evil and sick. Please don't fall for it. Al paedophiles should be locked up or castrated. Talk to ANYONE who's been abused as a child, and they will tell you of the hell they've had to go through and the devastating consequences.
Heffter ago
I agree, well thought of and solid logic behind too.
Still there are people who say that minors can have sex life so to speak that's not harmful. Where I live, majority of 12 years olds have sexual experiences already, but usually with peers or just slightly older (teen agers).
I guess the problem arises when the other party is either in a position of power and/or considerably older.
But there seems to be a bias there too, older women lusting after younger men (16+) is seen as cool "cougar" thing, but older guys with younger girls (16+) are seen as pedopigs and molesters.
But yeah, it's a complex thing and I think we better be in the safe side and limit the sex life of minors than expose them to greater harm by being too lax.
But things change fast, who would have thought 30 years ago that gay couples could marry and adopt children?
It is because of lobbying massively and I'm afraid pedo issue will be next on agenda possibly with zoophiliacs.