Not to be confrontional but Alex should have been more clear about his stance on Pizzagate. The literal and/or implied message he's giving out is that we should stop wasting our time investigating this and/or Pizzagate is more of a diversion than a serious investigative path. What is wrong if people continue investigating good leads? Or what is wrong if his channel reports allegations of such and such or reports on stories that are on the internet? The problem is that Alex puts too much weight on the theory that the MSM has planted this story as a diversion from other criminal or sinister activities indicated or written in the Podesta/Clinton leaks. But what's the evidence for his theory? Is the evidence for his theory better than the complied evidence of the stickied summaries for Pizzagate or the good articles written about the whole view? Alex Jones to his credit does important work, which is why its disappointing that he's vague on his stance on Pizzagate. But that's exactly what some wanted to happen, so that Pizzagate won't gain so much momentum and instead would die off. Just because a piece of information among many turned out to be a baiting lie does not necessarily discredit the other pieces. Neither does it necessarily mean that the other pieces are planted by MSM agents (some pieces of evidence occurred a year or 2 before the leaks). Nobody is asking Alex Jones to go 100% on this if he doesnt believe in it, but it is a big disservice to the other dedicated investigators to write them off on the basis on his theory for reasons given above.

Part of the video where Alex lays out his theory on Pizzagate being a diversion https://youtu.be/pA65Upo_AEM?t=261