i do not condone harassment of any kind, and i feel it is only likely to get in the way of the truth. I do not feel this caller is harassing. these would not be hard questions, to someone who had nothing to hide. they are not hard questions, by any stretch. Companies usually issue statements when they change logos. unless they are doing it obsequiously. If so, why? why not take the opportunity to say, "we saw it was similar to a pedophile symbol and wanted to show our condemnation of that, by changing our sign." This is an extreme response, to a light hearted call. The man at Besta says the most extreme insults and tries to act threatened and under a huge inquisition, when all he was asked was really one question. He claims he is going to send the police to the caller, but for what? it is a travesty, that they are trying to say it is wrong , to simply ask questions . They are using this absurd sense of victimisation, to avoid simply answering the questions. If they were able to answer them, speculation would end.... We need to put together some questions ,and pose them, in ways that can not be called harassment, and see what their answers are.
people quick to call people "idiots" and other insults,are usually the only ones, who suffer from idiocy. Just as, this person from Besta is quick to resort to insults. in debating terms, we call that a win. You have just conceded, thank you. Why are you concerned so much about the rights of Besta pizza and not the children, who we still do not know, if they are safe? Many are missing. We should all gladly put our "rights" aside, in any way, that will expedite their safety. More people should be asking questions, until we know the answers. But it is not a violation of any right, anyway just to ask questions... it is perfectly natural, and only guilty people, really, find it confronting. Innocent people are glad of the opportunity. This person should have offered and polygraph ages ago. An innocent person, would want to clear their name. well beyond guilty, IMO
Did you just get done watching some detective show last night or something? You have a wild, yet misguided, imagination. This wasn't a debate. It was some guido calling and harassing a legal business. It's LEGALLY called harassment.
view the rest of the comments →
YouaremeandIamyou ago
i do not condone harassment of any kind, and i feel it is only likely to get in the way of the truth. I do not feel this caller is harassing. these would not be hard questions, to someone who had nothing to hide. they are not hard questions, by any stretch. Companies usually issue statements when they change logos. unless they are doing it obsequiously. If so, why? why not take the opportunity to say, "we saw it was similar to a pedophile symbol and wanted to show our condemnation of that, by changing our sign." This is an extreme response, to a light hearted call. The man at Besta says the most extreme insults and tries to act threatened and under a huge inquisition, when all he was asked was really one question. He claims he is going to send the police to the caller, but for what? it is a travesty, that they are trying to say it is wrong , to simply ask questions . They are using this absurd sense of victimisation, to avoid simply answering the questions. If they were able to answer them, speculation would end.... We need to put together some questions ,and pose them, in ways that can not be called harassment, and see what their answers are.
HarveyKlinger ago
If you don't feel it is harassment you're an idiot. I would say go ask them if THEY think it's harassment but I'm afraid you would.
YouaremeandIamyou ago
people quick to call people "idiots" and other insults,are usually the only ones, who suffer from idiocy. Just as, this person from Besta is quick to resort to insults. in debating terms, we call that a win. You have just conceded, thank you. Why are you concerned so much about the rights of Besta pizza and not the children, who we still do not know, if they are safe? Many are missing. We should all gladly put our "rights" aside, in any way, that will expedite their safety. More people should be asking questions, until we know the answers. But it is not a violation of any right, anyway just to ask questions... it is perfectly natural, and only guilty people, really, find it confronting. Innocent people are glad of the opportunity. This person should have offered and polygraph ages ago. An innocent person, would want to clear their name. well beyond guilty, IMO
HarveyKlinger ago
Did you just get done watching some detective show last night or something? You have a wild, yet misguided, imagination. This wasn't a debate. It was some guido calling and harassing a legal business. It's LEGALLY called harassment.
YouaremeandIamyou ago
no, just asking questions, that need asking.