DISINFORMATION: "However, the two e-fits were based on descriptions of a single suspect by two witnesses, not two different suspects, a crucial detail that was left out." -Absolute lie. Suffolk police and SY have refused to clarify this. Instead they use the phrasing: " We are unable to distingush' for all questions- THEY ARE GAGGED. The MI5 from MCCanns investigation have CONFIRMED A GAG ORDER IS IN EFFECT.
These EFITS were made from 10+ witnesses, and they describe 4 suspicious men and 1 woman. THESE ARE NOT EFITs of the same person.
This is why it's so hilarious that all you "investigators" have desperately clung to those efits for so long as a critical piece of your "investigation".
McCanns whole detective team is MI5. Are you disputing this?
Do you dispute there is a gag order? Because they have stated it publicly.
They are using doubletalk to avoid clarifying facts: "We can't "DISTINGUISH" details.( ?! Are you kidding me?! )
There were multiple witnesses who made efits. And more than two efits were made of people of suspicion. At least 4 were made. From dozens of interviews, several stories stood out as possibly significant. "the waiting man" " The man carrying child" "The ugly man". Of all the fits made TWO WERE HELD BACK 5 YEARS.
What you think you watch on that shitty BBC show is how they handle gag orders, deflect interest, and cover up pedophiles. LIKE SAVILLE.
We are talking about THESE TWO efits. Not every efit related to the case. The day these efits were revealed to the public, it was explained that they were two renderings of one man who was seen by a married couple, who said he was 20-40 years old.
I love the lunacy implied by believing that they are being forced to cover up the Podesta involvement while simultaneously being told to go right ahead and release two pictures "of the Podestas" as suspects on national TV.
Yeah, they were forced to cover it up for five years, then the superiors decided "eh, let's not cover it up anymore" so they released the efits, but they said "well, let's sort of cover it up, we'll release the efits, but we'll say they're of just one person, and we'll say the witnesses said it was one guy 20-40 and hope they never contradict us publicly".
view the rest of the comments →
QuestionEverything ago
DISINFORMATION: "However, the two e-fits were based on descriptions of a single suspect by two witnesses, not two different suspects, a crucial detail that was left out." -Absolute lie. Suffolk police and SY have refused to clarify this. Instead they use the phrasing: " We are unable to distingush' for all questions- THEY ARE GAGGED. The MI5 from MCCanns investigation have CONFIRMED A GAG ORDER IS IN EFFECT.
These EFITS were made from 10+ witnesses, and they describe 4 suspicious men and 1 woman. THESE ARE NOT EFITs of the same person.
comeonpeople ago
Bullshit.
The fucking HEAD OF THE INVESTIGATION spelled this out for you on the live BBC Crimewatch special. https://youtu.be/OZ8jmdWlB8Y?t=23m34s
This is why it's so hilarious that all you "investigators" have desperately clung to those efits for so long as a critical piece of your "investigation".
QuestionEverything ago
McCanns whole detective team is MI5. Are you disputing this?
Do you dispute there is a gag order? Because they have stated it publicly.
They are using doubletalk to avoid clarifying facts: "We can't "DISTINGUISH" details.( ?! Are you kidding me?! )
There were multiple witnesses who made efits. And more than two efits were made of people of suspicion. At least 4 were made. From dozens of interviews, several stories stood out as possibly significant. "the waiting man" " The man carrying child" "The ugly man". Of all the fits made TWO WERE HELD BACK 5 YEARS.
What you think you watch on that shitty BBC show is how they handle gag orders, deflect interest, and cover up pedophiles. LIKE SAVILLE.
comeonpeople ago
We are talking about THESE TWO efits. Not every efit related to the case. The day these efits were revealed to the public, it was explained that they were two renderings of one man who was seen by a married couple, who said he was 20-40 years old.
I love the lunacy implied by believing that they are being forced to cover up the Podesta involvement while simultaneously being told to go right ahead and release two pictures "of the Podestas" as suspects on national TV.
QuestionEverything ago
THEY HID THE EFITS for FIVE YEARS YOU FUCKING MORON.
Wrap your tiny head around that fact.
comeonpeople ago
Yeah, they were forced to cover it up for five years, then the superiors decided "eh, let's not cover it up anymore" so they released the efits, but they said "well, let's sort of cover it up, we'll release the efits, but we'll say they're of just one person, and we'll say the witnesses said it was one guy 20-40 and hope they never contradict us publicly".
Brilliant.
QuestionEverything ago
THATS YOUR EXPLANATION?
lol. Go awaY SHILL.
iTS PRETTY FUCKING OBVIOUS WHY THEY GOT RELEASED, BUT YOU'D NEED A BRAIN TO FIGURE THAT OUT..