Does anyone want to collaboratively dissect THEIR arguments with a counter? I like how they believe they disproved by pulling out actual wrong elements.
Comet Ping Pong is not the CENTER.
THEY DIDN'T EXPLAIN SHIT. Do people really buy these half-assed explanations?
IT TOOK THREE PEOPLE TO WRITE THIS? C. Kang is there, too! Fuck, they are brazen bastards.
Different ventilation systems, located on different walls.
The "kill room" is much larger/longer than the standard walk-in depicted in the NYTimes article.
I pointed that out as well, but thanks for the direct links. That debunks their debunking and also points how poor the editing was or how clearly the intent was to mislead.
view the rest of the comments →
angryindividual ago
Does anyone want to collaboratively dissect THEIR arguments with a counter? I like how they believe they disproved by pulling out actual wrong elements.
Comet Ping Pong is not the CENTER.
THEY DIDN'T EXPLAIN SHIT. Do people really buy these half-assed explanations?
IT TOOK THREE PEOPLE TO WRITE THIS? C. Kang is there, too! Fuck, they are brazen bastards.
eMalum ago
First thing that really stood out to me is:
This walk-in cooler: https://i.sli.mg/86mWlT.png
Is not the same cooler as this one: https://i.sli.mg/Dbw8xX.jpg
Different ventilation systems, located on different walls. The "kill room" is much larger/longer than the standard walk-in depicted in the NYTimes article.
Soooo... that pretty much debunks that argument.
MeatballPizza ago
I pointed that out as well, but thanks for the direct links. That debunks their debunking and also points how poor the editing was or how clearly the intent was to mislead.
Can we demand the Editor make a retraction?