The evidence is overwhelming but circumstantial in virtually all cases. The story loses validity when we start to apply it to specific people, because it looks insane without first discussing the history of child abuse rings.
So the main "Fakeness" of it is simply that the fringe members and shrills sometimes state conclusions without bulletproof evidence, which would seem like zealotry to someone that hasn't done any research, nor even understands the process of critical though.
My advice is to focus on things we know are true. For instance: Jeffery Epstein served 15 months of a 18 month sentence for prostitution with a 14 year old. He owns an island. ...then you go from there. You point out that society as a whole accepts that reality and chooses to ignore it. When ideas are forced on someone they are instantly a hoax.
That doesn't change the struggle you're going to have informing someone that doesn't want to know about it. Nor would we benefit by trying to punish the guilty by destroying the justice system.
Well, absolutely but I don't think you can overthrow a government and justice system at the same time without serious problems...just saying we need to be careful and determined to keep moving forward or the establishment will must use the excess energy to crush us. If that makes sense...I was just called a shrill for a post I made about basic strategy when speaking to normies.
What is justice when you're oppressed by corruption? The answer is vigilance. You have a civil duty and responsibility to respond when there is crime. When authorities don't want to hear you, the problem doesn't cease to exist, nor does your conscience.
view the rest of the comments →
Princeofcats ago
The evidence is overwhelming but circumstantial in virtually all cases. The story loses validity when we start to apply it to specific people, because it looks insane without first discussing the history of child abuse rings.
So the main "Fakeness" of it is simply that the fringe members and shrills sometimes state conclusions without bulletproof evidence, which would seem like zealotry to someone that hasn't done any research, nor even understands the process of critical though.
My advice is to focus on things we know are true. For instance: Jeffery Epstein served 15 months of a 18 month sentence for prostitution with a 14 year old. He owns an island. ...then you go from there. You point out that society as a whole accepts that reality and chooses to ignore it. When ideas are forced on someone they are instantly a hoax.
fvckh1m_up ago
The only thing you need to understand is that the evidence is not circumstantial, it's symptomatic.
Princeofcats ago
That doesn't change the struggle you're going to have informing someone that doesn't want to know about it. Nor would we benefit by trying to punish the guilty by destroying the justice system.
Anonymous987654321 ago
maybe the whole system needs an overhaul including the justice system?
Princeofcats ago
Well, absolutely but I don't think you can overthrow a government and justice system at the same time without serious problems...just saying we need to be careful and determined to keep moving forward or the establishment will must use the excess energy to crush us. If that makes sense...I was just called a shrill for a post I made about basic strategy when speaking to normies.
fvckh1m_up ago
What is justice when you're oppressed by corruption? The answer is vigilance. You have a civil duty and responsibility to respond when there is crime. When authorities don't want to hear you, the problem doesn't cease to exist, nor does your conscience.