You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SIMONBARROW ago

Absolutely. Wikipedia is an attempt to control all general information and constantly revise it in the light of whatever it is that they want general knowledge to consist of at any particular time. For example, just today, David Seaman reported that they have revised his entry in order to make his professional background in journalism disappear. It is damn near impossible to revise a Wikipedia entry if you seek to include information they want suppressed. Many have tried and all have failed.

CIAEatsShit ago

Yes, WIKI you are GUILTY of "Lying by Omission"

Shocked, we're Shocked

http://tarpley.net/2013/06/19/how-to-identify-a-cia-limited-hangout-operation/


Wikipedia Has Forever Destroyed their credibility. Nobody should ever again publicly say with a straight face they use WikiPedia as a reference.

What they have done is made Wikipedia into an Oracle of Truth, Approved by the State. If its in Wikipedia its real, if its NOT then its fake. 100% part of the pedophile cover-up.


Wiki doesn't say much about "Limited Hangout", just that its a Russian Creation.

But then you go to "Propaganda" and you hit the mother-load on Wiki ...

Propaganda is "information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote a political cause or point of view" (Oxford Online Dictionaries[1]). Propaganda is often associated with the psychological mechanisms of influencing and altering the attitude of a population toward a specific cause, position or political agenda in an effort to form a consensus to a standard set of belief patterns.[2]

Propaganda is information that is not impartial and is used primarily to influence an audience and further an agenda, often by presenting facts selectively (perhaps lying by omission) to encourage a particular synthesis, or using loaded messages to produce an emotional rather than a rational response to the information presented.[2]

Today the term propaganda is associated with a manipulative approach, but propaganda historically was a neutral descriptive term.[2][3]


Yes, WIKI you are GUILTY of "Lying by Omission"