The article might not specifically state it - been awhile since I've read it. But it's pretty well known by anyone who has researched the pedo rings over the past couple decades that he is a very questionable "influence" on these investigations. I've read so much about him and watched so many videos that I cannot recall what specific connection to CIA was made and it's likely we'll never know for sure. But he tends to show up in many investigations and people involved report strange behavior and cultivates associations that are often explained as COINTELPRO. I certainly don't know for sure, just that there can't be so much crap written about someone if there's no basis. Where there is smoke there is usually fire.
view the rest of the comments →
hedy ago
The article might not specifically state it - been awhile since I've read it. But it's pretty well known by anyone who has researched the pedo rings over the past couple decades that he is a very questionable "influence" on these investigations. I've read so much about him and watched so many videos that I cannot recall what specific connection to CIA was made and it's likely we'll never know for sure. But he tends to show up in many investigations and people involved report strange behavior and cultivates associations that are often explained as COINTELPRO. I certainly don't know for sure, just that there can't be so much crap written about someone if there's no basis. Where there is smoke there is usually fire.