You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

LostandFound ago

Awesome find, top kek even if circumstantial

krbrown ago

Just an FYI guys ..circumstantial evidence is STILL evidence. In fact, if you have enough circumstantial evidence, even in the absence of hard evidence, it could be plenty for an indictment/guilty verdict. So if you are "debating" anyone and they are looking for "hard" proof otherwise they wont believe, just know that circumstantial evidence (legally) is sometimes plenty.

http://www.theforensicteacher.com/Evidence.html

CeepsNo ago

Yes, mountains of circumstantial evidence is why people think OJ was guilty! This has a mt Everest