You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

TruthIsProvidence ago

warn them about it why don't ya

MAGAphobia ago

That's the beauty about it, even if they know they can't stop it. They could even participate in the organization if they wanted. It wouldn't matter. It wouldn't even be an organization in the sense that there wouldn't be any central leadership. It'd be more like a group of anonymous people that operate openly based off a code. There'd be a process for everything and as long as people made sure that everybody was following the code we'd be untouchable and the organization would never die. I already have it down in my head, I've already thought about this before and I've studied multiple groups throughout history that have done this very same thing.

kekistocrat ago

Sounds great. Organize without organizing. Infiltration is one of the alphabet gangs' tactics, obviously. I agree, you're on the right path with attacking this conceptually. No central leadership is key, but it does put quite the burden of self-ownership and responsibility (integrity) onto the researchers. It conjures some questions, perhaps naive, but humor me. And, of course, I respect a decline in details for fear of reveal. 1. How is this different from voat? Exclusion of mods? 2. Is this akin to the honor system in the military? ( i.e.,soldier does something superiors dislike, superiors punish all soldiers, soldiers punish initial soldier) 3. Could the compartmentalization be used nefariously? (to block researchers from each other's posts or knowledge they've gathered, etc.) 4. I'm convinced that TPTB merely watch this research, and possibly few others, and simply put their heads together and contrive ways to spin it and stay a couple steps ahead. Would this approach they have be confronted if not completely halted by your method? All in all, great idea.

MAGAphobia ago

Thanks for taking interest. We need smart people to set this up properly.

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1465014