Thought experiment: assume you were Alefantis, and assume that you were guilty as hell, would you want police combing through your restaurant?

Think of it this way. If you were going to do a false flag on yourself to silence investigations, you certainly would be a FOOL to design it in a way that a gunman walks in peacefully and does nothing but get scores of police officers digging through your place.

Think about this: certain agencies now have a pretext to comb through every nook and cranny of that place -- without a search warrant.

Points to consider:

You can see in the video that they have locked the place down, nobody is allowed inside, and they will be inside all day tomorrow doing... who knows what -- collecting DNA from the backroom perhaps, bringing in bloodhounds, searching for backfilled holes?

If James Alefantis were guilty and wanting to do a false flag, this would be the worst, most amateurish means to do it, because it invited swarms of officers inside to do a deep search without a warrant.

Now, we also have to bear in mind that the "gunman's" father is a former exec of an organization that prevents child trafficking. I understand, given everything we've seen, the rush to be skeptical about such an organization.

But, SOME of these organizations are actually legitimate. Even our own community is informally an organization trying to put a stop to this stuff.

Could it be, that this father had connections to LEOs, actually is concerned about the safety of children, and his son did a performance as a "gunman" (his son is a confirmed an actor) in order to essentially get Alefantis raided?

Listen, if Alefantis were really going to use a false flag to shut down the investigation for good, I guarantee you there would have been violence. It would have to be bad enough to justify a major shut down of many sites. Better yet, he'd probably burn the entire place down or bomb it to get rid of the evidence as well. At the very least, perhaps a shooting -- not just a man walking in peacefully and triggering scores of police to swarm the place, shut it down, and start searching around.

A man simply walking in peacefully and causing the police to swarm in? That, if anything, is the worst possible luck Alefantis could have right now, if he is guilty. It looks to me that he was SWATTED -- meaning someone intentionally signaled a false alarm to get police rushing in and searching without a warrant.

Folks, I am starting to suspect that this was indeed a false flag, and that we may be seeing some interesting things come to light in the next 72 hours or sooner.

Perhaps this is wishful thinking on my part -- that would be a fair criticism I suppose. But the very fact that this was so amateurish suggests to me that it was not a false flag in the traditional sense of an event being used to suppress us, but a false flag more along the lines of having a perp raided without needing a warrant.

As for the media going apeshit with the "fake news" hypnotic term on the masses, well that is something they were doing already. And again, a peaceful man with a firearm is not a good enough way to pull on people's heart strings to the degree that we are shut down -- if they were going to do it that way, it would have been violent and tragic.

Another point: that the traffic cams were pointed away from the establishment shortly beforehand indicates to me that someone at the city level was, perhaps, instructed by federal agents to do that.

And yet another point: when the first few articles came out regarding Comet, it was mentioned that the "FBI would neither confirm nor deny that they were investigating Comet."

That allows for the possibility that they had the place under surveillance, probably long before we even investigated. Maybe they were waiting for the word to spread online, and now they have given themselves a pretext to search without a warrant.

Time will tell.