I find it interesting that in many of the blogs and posts connected by Pizzagate, there is an unusual and psuedointellectual quality to the writing style. As you read, there is something nagging you in the back of your head. Kind of an alarm or warning that something is wrong here. It's group style that they all seemingly follow. Sense and nonsense. Beauty and beast. Connected and unconnected. Open yet closed. If, as has been mentioned before, they need to essentially flaunt their crimes, I think this is how they do it. They tell you openly in riddles. The initiated understand but those of us on the outside read and our subconscious says, "BEWARE!!". Just an observation. You are all doing yeoman's work. Good job!
view the rest of the comments →
shesell ago
See below. Just a few references.
thicktail1730947 ago
Thanks for the links. Yeah, it does tend to feel off to read the related materials. Some of that is just... our context. Reading things in context of pizzagate is miserable. But some of it is the result of their word choices being pervasively odd. "If you will be around for dinner or pizza" is an odd thing to say. "Do you think I'll do better playing dominos on cheese than on pasta?" is an odd thing to say. These things are excusable, but they're still rather odd. This is the whole problem with how these people communicate. Excusable, but odd. Except if someone must be excusable all the time, are they perhaps misusing their words?
I believe that's the question which got this investigation started.