Had lunch with my friend today who has practiced law in DC/VA/MD for decades. His info and insights are as follow:
*
Among his peers, even though "pizzagate" is a relatively unused term, the Clinton Foundation, the Podesta emails, and human trafficking have been coming up more and more frequently in every day conversation.
*
Crowd-sourced or citizen-investigation derived evidence is perfectly valid and will hold up. Also, most criminals are convicted on circumstancial evidence. It's just a chain or "pile" of it (like exactly what we are doing).
*
There is (in his opinion) a very high chance of a special prosecutor being appointed for these matters, and very early in the coming administration.
*
He also commended the efforts that have been made. Cheers, keep up the good work.
view the rest of the comments →
mosswitch ago
Thankyou! Ive been waiting to hear from some legal professionals. This is exactly what i thought. We dont necessarily need a smoking gun. The mountain of pieces to the puzzle has convinced nearly 100% of us here that this is real... so why wouldnt it convince a jury is what ive thought for a while now. Besides, im sure the smoking gun(s) are being held under lock and key by the FBI right now. My thinking is search warrants are probably a few signatures away from becoming reality.
Free_Radical ago
Way too early for a jury. What we have must be fully investigated. A bunch of search warrants, interrogations and forensic drilling would blow this thing wide open. You only need one of them to start talking and it's over.
This, of course, requires a real investigation. So far we've only seen suppression from our "authorities".