I understand that not everyone interested in pizzagate has experience in publishing research articles. I also understand that there are lots of people with bad intentions out there.

To help those, who are trying to honestly write investigative posts, and to make it harder for those with bad intentions (for example using trigger words and sensationalism and hiding the missing causal logic for conclusions), I'd highly recommend that the moderators introduce a short mandatory introduction chapter for every "investigative" thread.

Suggestion (each paragraph maximum three sentences; the shorter and more to the point, the better):

SUMMARY [short description what the article is about]

WORK THESIS [what the author wants to prove/show/discuss]

FACTS THE ARTICLE CONTAINS [supporting THEORY]

Optional: ARGUMENTS contradicting the articles THEORY

CONCLUSION [of the article]

OPEN QUESTIONS

Example: SUMMARY [what the article is about] The juvenating effect of blood from young people for older people, is an almost unknown topic to the public. Because of the positive effects, blood from young people could be a huge (black) market.

WORK THESIS [what the article intends to prove/show/discuss] The article shows that blood plasma from young people is a precious resource.

FACTS THE ARTICLE CONTAINS [supporting THEORY]: Articles from big mainstream media describing the scientific research in this field.

CONCLUSION [of the article]: The proven rejuvenating effect of blood from young people makes blood harvesting a plausible motive to abduct children.

end of intro - begin of article