You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

YouaremeandIamyou ago

nice work. All people who do these things, leave a trail. it is their unconscious way of coming clean. Jorge especially. when common names are mispelled, like jorge, george, it is a sign of false name use. Take for instance, another George -geroge brooks, or george burke -brooks and burke sound similar. if you gave the alias, and were found out, you could throw off, and say it was misheard . George Brooks, gave his name as George Burke when he reported a Mcann sighting. Later it was found out to be brooks. I can imagine of confronted on this, he would say oh I said brooks, they must have misheard it has burke. big red flag, that no one knows who this George Brooks from the uk is, who own pizza shops next to each other in Portugal. I feel it is george brooks the photographer in the uk. He has hotdogs written on his blog and instagram. he has white hair on the sides, like the passport photocopy of brooks' passport. I need confirmation

jml1201 ago

Yes, you make a great point. Let me know if you think they look alike. Keep in mind I thought this last week. Now that I saw the link MULTIVU (where George De Torres works) when researching John Pichardo's ex boss Major Ron Bursoe who was in Haiti at the time I feel this is too weird.

YouaremeandIamyou ago

that facebook, is a super find. shows he has tried to make a new identity. or has been set up with one. i can only imagine, so long as there are pedophiles like Clinton in charge, a lot of people were given liscences to get away with these things. Jorge mentions working undercover. Could it be, he claims to working undercover to find child traffickers. This would be the perfect get out of jail free card, which it seems this person did have some help, to be able to say, when caught, "I was just investigating it," undercover. Notably he did not give this excuse. but maybe he did not need to, as he was told he would be ok. what is ironic, is I was just watching a doco on Australian tv, that talks about pedophiles who prey on children overseas. It had American people who were trying to help authorities get convictions. They made a big deal, about how they are stepping up to the problem. yet in the case of Silsby and Jorge we have the opposite, where they are intervening to save them. This points to them having direct connctions, that they did not want to comt to light. Silsby and Jorge both know plenty, I feel. they both operated as though with impunity, and indeed got immunity when found out. something very wrong far, when people who kidnap entire groups of children, are being let off.