I have kind of assumed there were two possibilities w Wikileaks: 1) It's 100% compromised, Assange was taken to a black ops site or worse, and his assorted workers were shutdown. Or 2) that Trump's team told them to hold off. He's got great Intel. He had inside info before he ever ran. So my theory is he felt releasing the info may cause more damage to the election vs good, as in a scandal so large it allows Obama to try to stop election if Hillary was no longer an option. So it's possible Trump made a deal, hold off on release, lay low and wait till the election is over. If Trump is elected wait until after Jan 20 to drop any bombs. If Hillary wins, then drop the bombs, but don't disrupt the election.
I've seen Trump play so many psyop games on these POS's it's been enjoyable to watch.
Number 2 is a reach, all respect. Wiki has been compromised and we have NOT had any real proof of life - nothing verifiable at all - since around October 14.
I don't disagree. I always choose to be optimistic until there's no reason left for optimism. It certainly looks bad right now, but the one thing I keep thinking is Assange has had nothing but time for four years, plus plenty of experience before this, to plan for all possible eventualities. For instance, if I were him I'd have had someone specifically offline that also had access to DMS if he were to go missing. Someone completely unknowable and untraceable. And the second thing is, all of his workers in different countries were taking extreme measures to mask their locations. What are the odds that all of those different locations would be found and disabled simultaneously? I guess my main point is that I have quite a bit of faith in Assange's ability to outsmart them one way or another, and certainly the most incentive to do so.
view the rest of the comments →
Freemasonsrus ago
I have kind of assumed there were two possibilities w Wikileaks: 1) It's 100% compromised, Assange was taken to a black ops site or worse, and his assorted workers were shutdown. Or 2) that Trump's team told them to hold off. He's got great Intel. He had inside info before he ever ran. So my theory is he felt releasing the info may cause more damage to the election vs good, as in a scandal so large it allows Obama to try to stop election if Hillary was no longer an option. So it's possible Trump made a deal, hold off on release, lay low and wait till the election is over. If Trump is elected wait until after Jan 20 to drop any bombs. If Hillary wins, then drop the bombs, but don't disrupt the election.
I've seen Trump play so many psyop games on these POS's it's been enjoyable to watch.
Mmag1234 ago
Number 2 is a reach, all respect. Wiki has been compromised and we have NOT had any real proof of life - nothing verifiable at all - since around October 14.
Freemasonsrus ago
I don't disagree. I always choose to be optimistic until there's no reason left for optimism. It certainly looks bad right now, but the one thing I keep thinking is Assange has had nothing but time for four years, plus plenty of experience before this, to plan for all possible eventualities. For instance, if I were him I'd have had someone specifically offline that also had access to DMS if he were to go missing. Someone completely unknowable and untraceable. And the second thing is, all of his workers in different countries were taking extreme measures to mask their locations. What are the odds that all of those different locations would be found and disabled simultaneously? I guess my main point is that I have quite a bit of faith in Assange's ability to outsmart them one way or another, and certainly the most incentive to do so.
Mmag1234 ago
I hope, hope, hope he has done just that - outsmarted them.