I honestly am starting to wonder if Assange even had anything more. He leveraged that possibility for so long that I think they called his bluff and he had squat.
I know he was involved in some dark online circles, and I wonder if he was just bluffing his leverage. Now he's gone without a trace.
I just straight out disagree with you. He wouldn't bluff on his life and the continuation of his revenge against these guys. He was likely raped as a kid in "The Family" in Australia. He gave a fuck. He had to filter out the stuff people couldn't stomach.
Filter out stuff people couldn't stomach makes no sense and someone exposing the darkest truths of this world would never do that. Why in God's name would he threaten to expose one of the most massive conspiracies in history and then "filter" out and water down the bad stuff to the point that we don't even know what he's exposing? "Filtering out" sounds like a cop out to describe his lack of revelations. Until he fulfills he previous promises, I don't expect more.
I still don't think he had shit. If he did have anything, it wasn't what we think it is. I think he was just bluffing and released everything. He claimed a few times that he would destroy the Clinton's or bring down this or that, but nothing really came of the leaks. Veritas seemed more damning that WikiLeaks.
Now he's gone without a trace, none of his friends will prove his existence, there was no deadman's switch, there was no booby trap to let the world know he's been kidnapped, NOTHING. Just some bullshit that was tweeted out? The whole thing seems HIGHLY suspect and I think some people are too enamored in the idea of Assange and Snowden to admit that he is either a fraudster that was bluffing to help his own legal matters, or he had the worlds worst plan and was squashed by the feds.
Everything people are saying about him is nothing but conjecture. "He wouldn't bluff." You don't know that. "Likely raped." You don't know that. "He gave a fuck." You don't know that. "He filtered it." You REALLY don't know that.
What DO we know? He made big promises and did not come through. He assured us of a plan that has either 1. not been executed, or 2. it sucked. That is all we really know about this.
What does that have to do with his broken promises and lack of damning revelations?
I honestly don't even see how you think it was his doing. Do we have proof that he hacked these emails? Solid proof that he is the one that got the emails and he is the one that released it? I've seen none.
What does that have to do with him promising shit that never happened? What does that have to do with the possibility that he was bluffing and didn't have shit? So far, WE are the ones investigating and exposing this shit. All he did was dump hacked emails that he may or may not have even gotten himself. He may be taking credit for someone else's work for all we know.
What don't you get about that? He didn't release ANYTHING damning or destroying, nor is he even here to explain. That is the fact of the matter. Everything even remotely "damning" about pizzagate has been dug up by forum members, not WikiLeaks.
He has been trapped in that embassy for years and very well could be getting tortured/killed and you are trying to argue about him taking credit for things. What is wrong with you?
That guy is crazy! How can he say he hasn't given us anything? You're right we wouldn't have pizzagate without him! We wouldn't know about the Podesta's pedo terms! Nothing! What? Is he to blame for getting captured or killed before he released them all!
He isn't/wasn't taking credit for anything. He never claimed he stole those emails. He's the middle man in the leaking of information. Hackers and leakers send their data to him, he checks it out to see if it can be confirmed to be the real deal and then publishes.
view the rest of the comments →
WewLaddy ago
I honestly am starting to wonder if Assange even had anything more. He leveraged that possibility for so long that I think they called his bluff and he had squat.
I know he was involved in some dark online circles, and I wonder if he was just bluffing his leverage. Now he's gone without a trace.
THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES ago
I just straight out disagree with you. He wouldn't bluff on his life and the continuation of his revenge against these guys. He was likely raped as a kid in "The Family" in Australia. He gave a fuck. He had to filter out the stuff people couldn't stomach.
WewLaddy ago
Filter out stuff people couldn't stomach makes no sense and someone exposing the darkest truths of this world would never do that. Why in God's name would he threaten to expose one of the most massive conspiracies in history and then "filter" out and water down the bad stuff to the point that we don't even know what he's exposing? "Filtering out" sounds like a cop out to describe his lack of revelations. Until he fulfills he previous promises, I don't expect more.
I still don't think he had shit. If he did have anything, it wasn't what we think it is. I think he was just bluffing and released everything. He claimed a few times that he would destroy the Clinton's or bring down this or that, but nothing really came of the leaks. Veritas seemed more damning that WikiLeaks.
Now he's gone without a trace, none of his friends will prove his existence, there was no deadman's switch, there was no booby trap to let the world know he's been kidnapped, NOTHING. Just some bullshit that was tweeted out? The whole thing seems HIGHLY suspect and I think some people are too enamored in the idea of Assange and Snowden to admit that he is either a fraudster that was bluffing to help his own legal matters, or he had the worlds worst plan and was squashed by the feds.
Everything people are saying about him is nothing but conjecture. "He wouldn't bluff." You don't know that. "Likely raped." You don't know that. "He gave a fuck." You don't know that. "He filtered it." You REALLY don't know that. What DO we know? He made big promises and did not come through. He assured us of a plan that has either 1. not been executed, or 2. it sucked. That is all we really know about this.
KingKongisCTR ago
You wouldn't be on this site right now if it wasn't for him.....
WewLaddy ago
What does that have to do with his broken promises and lack of damning revelations?
I honestly don't even see how you think it was his doing. Do we have proof that he hacked these emails? Solid proof that he is the one that got the emails and he is the one that released it? I've seen none.
KingKongisCTR ago
Pizzagate is a damning revelation that his platform allowed to come to light. How do you not get that?
WewLaddy ago
What does that have to do with him promising shit that never happened? What does that have to do with the possibility that he was bluffing and didn't have shit? So far, WE are the ones investigating and exposing this shit. All he did was dump hacked emails that he may or may not have even gotten himself. He may be taking credit for someone else's work for all we know.
What don't you get about that? He didn't release ANYTHING damning or destroying, nor is he even here to explain. That is the fact of the matter. Everything even remotely "damning" about pizzagate has been dug up by forum members, not WikiLeaks.
KingKongisCTR ago
He has been trapped in that embassy for years and very well could be getting tortured/killed and you are trying to argue about him taking credit for things. What is wrong with you?
Pizzagatethroaway499 ago
That guy is crazy! How can he say he hasn't given us anything? You're right we wouldn't have pizzagate without him! We wouldn't know about the Podesta's pedo terms! Nothing! What? Is he to blame for getting captured or killed before he released them all!
Fragnostus ago
He isn't/wasn't taking credit for anything. He never claimed he stole those emails. He's the middle man in the leaking of information. Hackers and leakers send their data to him, he checks it out to see if it can be confirmed to be the real deal and then publishes.
Pizzagatethroaway499 ago
Yeah I get that but he had a role in us knowing now.
Fragnostus ago
Sorry my reply was actually directed at @WewLaddy, not sure why I replied to you... ^^
Pizzagatethroaway499 ago
Gotcha!:)