Just happened to check out the photographer that took the picture in the basement of Comet... Todd Franson. You will see he took some of the other pictures of James at the restaurant as well.
Here is some of his recent work. http://www.metroweekly.com/2016/01/puppy-love-mid-atlantic-leather-2016/
A search reveals one of his collaborators, Scot G. Brooks, a painter. Scott has a FB page and a website. This is some real nasty stuff. Women with bruises and sick kid stuff. Podesta's must be all about this guy, ffs. Here is one example, but there are many.
http://www.scottgbrooks.com/art/patron_punishment%20_1000.jpg
Dang, just a brief look into one random pizza rabbit hole gets to be too much. These are some sick bastards.
view the rest of the comments →
knewyorickknewyorick ago
What if he paints his paintings, and doesn't abuse, molest or harass children. I myself don't find his work sick and I don't abuse, molest or harass children. Or men and women for that fact.
therealwopD ago
The photo that is posted at the top of this thread is not art. If you do not find that an extremely sick photograph than you are one sick bastard.
Sure, there are innocent pictures of naked babies in bathtubs.. being born... running around the house.... you could go on and on.
What you just referred to as art is a baby with a gag in its mouth, safety pins in its nipples, and a beaten red ass.. oh yeah and in fucking handcuffs?!? Did I mention the adult man that is dressed as a cop, wearing a "Mr. Punisher" ribbon around his shoulder, AND holding a god damn beating paddle!
You should probably know that there is another child with leather and chains around his dick with clothes pins on his nipples. AND one praying (probably for fucking help)
Just because it is painted and not on tv DOES NOT matter.. This sick piece of shit thought of it enough to fucking paint that.
Should be considered child porn. The "artist" should not be allowed to walk around where there are children. Some(ME) would argue that he shouldn't be allowed to walk around at all. Very simple.
can someone please get this to more people on here. I have a feeling it won't take long to find something here with the photographer and painter connection.
SHILL HERE? PEDO?
knewyorickknewyorick ago
O my, you figured me out: I am a shill. You want to buy a free child?
So you don't like critique on consumerism? Think of something you would never do. Fucking your own mother? Hurting a child? So that now means you want to fuck your own mother, or hurt a child.
Call me a pedo in real life and I'll break your neck, you fucking pathetic idiot.
therealwopD ago
defending child porn and a keyboard thug.
knewyorickknewyorick ago
Perhaps the children made of paint represent the innocent, the defenseless, the ignorance of all of us, the bernie supporters getting screwed over. Maybe the painting with the ice cream product says something about how we are being manipulated to buy with out asking about the process behind it. But you have your opinion and I have mine. Cheerio.
grlldcheese ago
Maybe all the paintings are about you being a fucking retard.
knewyorickknewyorick ago
Yes.
eckecko ago
Check the food chain one. They are actually shitting and pissing into a machine that is making "treats" for the kids. No, of course it isn't sick or abusive. Just having to look at that stuff is abusive. And I didn't peruse the entire collection. On the contrary, I was scared to look too much further... scared of my own brain getting too polluted from that shit. You enjoy now.
knewyorickknewyorick ago
Those kids are not real, they are made of paint.