What I find interesting is, that there is a timestamp for everything in the e-mail, from 8:25 AM until the arrival (+ programme) at Roberta's at 7:00 PM. But after that, the time for the departure and arriving "private residence" is missing. Not sure if this means anything, but why would someone exclude the "departure" time? Maybe to hide the unreasonable long time spent there, after the live music....
The email is stamped Tbd, a.k.a. to be decided. Implying they actively had no plan on how long the venture would take after the live music. Wouldn't say that this necessarily seems odd, but it doesn't help the case when there are clear markings of time for the cocktails and dinner.
Ah thanks, didn't know Tbd meant "to be decided". But you're right, it's not odd then and the cocktails and dinner markings make sense aswell since it's a birthday-party. Who doesn't plan like "starting at xy with cocktails and dinner is at zz"?
view the rest of the comments →
Initiate ago
What I find interesting is, that there is a timestamp for everything in the e-mail, from 8:25 AM until the arrival (+ programme) at Roberta's at 7:00 PM. But after that, the time for the departure and arriving "private residence" is missing. Not sure if this means anything, but why would someone exclude the "departure" time? Maybe to hide the unreasonable long time spent there, after the live music....
knivesalot ago
The email is stamped Tbd, a.k.a. to be decided. Implying they actively had no plan on how long the venture would take after the live music. Wouldn't say that this necessarily seems odd, but it doesn't help the case when there are clear markings of time for the cocktails and dinner.
Initiate ago
Ah thanks, didn't know Tbd meant "to be decided". But you're right, it's not odd then and the cocktails and dinner markings make sense aswell since it's a birthday-party. Who doesn't plan like "starting at xy with cocktails and dinner is at zz"?