🍕 BUCKS FISHING AND CAMPING the Other Restaurant Owned by Jimmy Comet featuring an Image of Meat Being Sacrificed and Birthday Candle Positioned as Erect Penis and CHILDREN'S UNDERWEAR. http://imgur.com/a/uBdLR
1- Nothing indicate that this is a "sacrifice". Sacrifices have a religious connotation. I dont see anything related to that here.
2- The tissue thats supposed to be a " CHILDREN UNDERWEAR " barely looks like an underwear. Nothing indicate that its a " children's " underwear. And, on the zoom, we clearly see that its only a tissue.
This kind of over the top speculation hurt our movement. Or am i missing something ?
The candle obviously sand for a penis. Now, about the 2 other clues, i'm just saying that there is too much interpretation and too few actual evidences.
For what it's worth, I know what "underwear" is being referenced in that <strike>article</strike> photo without looking because the first time I saw that picture I thought "why is a kid's underwear next to that steak?" I looked closer and determined it was just a napkin. A cloth napkin that was deliberately folded in the way that it is, and it's just a bit odd to me that nobody noticed in this obviously staged photo that the napkin looked like underwear and not a napkin. So odd, in fact, that I have a hard time believing it isn't deliberate. I've never mentioned it before, though, because even if it was deliberate there's no way to prove that.
Plausible deniability. Deny, deny, deny. Never give up the scam.
view the rest of the comments →
StrangeHologram ago
🍕 BUCKS FISHING AND CAMPING the Other Restaurant Owned by Jimmy Comet featuring an Image of Meat Being Sacrificed and Birthday Candle Positioned as Erect Penis and CHILDREN'S UNDERWEAR. http://imgur.com/a/uBdLR
occultelite ago
1- Nothing indicate that this is a "sacrifice". Sacrifices have a religious connotation. I dont see anything related to that here. 2- The tissue thats supposed to be a " CHILDREN UNDERWEAR " barely looks like an underwear. Nothing indicate that its a " children's " underwear. And, on the zoom, we clearly see that its only a tissue. This kind of over the top speculation hurt our movement. Or am i missing something ?
StrangeHologram ago
It's called photo styling. I guess the candle doesn't evoke anything to you, either?
occultelite ago
The candle obviously sand for a penis. Now, about the 2 other clues, i'm just saying that there is too much interpretation and too few actual evidences.
DentHouper ago
For what it's worth, I know what "underwear" is being referenced in that <strike>article</strike> photo without looking because the first time I saw that picture I thought "why is a kid's underwear next to that steak?" I looked closer and determined it was just a napkin. A cloth napkin that was deliberately folded in the way that it is, and it's just a bit odd to me that nobody noticed in this obviously staged photo that the napkin looked like underwear and not a napkin. So odd, in fact, that I have a hard time believing it isn't deliberate. I've never mentioned it before, though, because even if it was deliberate there's no way to prove that.
Plausible deniability. Deny, deny, deny. Never give up the scam.