As has been posted many times, these are two renderings based on a description of ONE suspect. An irish couple saw ONE man and said he was 20-40. So the fact that the police renderings happen to look like two different people, who each happen to look like one of the (60+ year old) Podesta brothers, is entirely a bizarre coincidence.
these are two renderings based on a description of ONE suspect.
That's clearly absurd, the face structure and hair is markedly different. The Smiths (the Irish couple) said that they didn't get a good look at the man and wouldn't be able to identify him.
It's a fact that they are renderings of one subject. You think the police released these two pictures to the media and then bizarrely LIED and said it was two renderings of one man?
BBC: "The man featured in two e-fits released by UK police investigating Madeleine McCann's disappearance was seen carrying a child towards the beach.
Police say a family saw the man with a blond-haired child of three or four, possibly wearing pyjamas, heading away from the McCanns' holiday apartment.
The witnesses said the man was white, 20 to 40 years old and of medium build. He had short brown hair, was clean-shaven and of medium height, they added."
Yes, facts are facts. The fact is that a husband and wife saw one man in his 20s-40s carrying a child. The police took their descriptions and did two different efit renderings, presumably one from the husband's description and one from the wife's.
lol @ the police releasing two images and then lying to say there was only one man. Why the fuck wouldn't they just release one image or not release any images if they were going to lie about it? Use your head.
presumably one from the husband's description and one from the wife's.
So why would they use different systems for each image? One clearly has higher resolution that the other. The Smiths said that they didn't get a good look at the man carrying the girl, how is is that the efits had detail like moles and a pressure mark caused by wearing classes?
Why the fuck wouldn't they just release one image or not release any images if they were going to lie about it?
Because the investigator(s) produced two images and the McCanns knew that. They didn't want to be implicated in a coverup, so they force-fitted the evidence to match the official narrative. The police sat on those images for years before finally releasing them, and they didn't get published on the Guardian's website until 2013, 6 years after Madeleine disappeared.
So somehow the McCanns knew about the two images? The police were forced to release both images for some reason because the McCanns knew about them, but had no qualms about lying about it being one suspect and not two? The McCanns would have blown the lid on the two images, but kept quiet about the number of suspects? And same with the irish couple?
lol @ the fucking efit having "a pressure mark caused by wearing glasses", as though that's something ANY witness would notice. You are seeing what you want to see, you could not make it any more clear. Who exactly do you think the witnesses were if not the Smiths? Who were these witnesses that were close enough and studied the suspects long enough to notice a tiny mole and a "pressure mark caused by wearing glasses"?
Yes, and it's not an implication. You are seeing what you want to see. If you think the couple saw this guy from two feet away and immediately noticed his "pressure mark" you're high. In any case lol @ the police including that in any case.
view the rest of the comments →
comeonpeople ago
As has been posted many times, these are two renderings based on a description of ONE suspect. An irish couple saw ONE man and said he was 20-40. So the fact that the police renderings happen to look like two different people, who each happen to look like one of the (60+ year old) Podesta brothers, is entirely a bizarre coincidence.
UglyTruth ago
That's clearly absurd, the face structure and hair is markedly different. The Smiths (the Irish couple) said that they didn't get a good look at the man and wouldn't be able to identify him.
This is discussed at length from 2:17:00 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL0-ePd3FCU
comeonpeople ago
It's a fact that they are renderings of one subject. You think the police released these two pictures to the media and then bizarrely LIED and said it was two renderings of one man?
BBC: "The man featured in two e-fits released by UK police investigating Madeleine McCann's disappearance was seen carrying a child towards the beach. Police say a family saw the man with a blond-haired child of three or four, possibly wearing pyjamas, heading away from the McCanns' holiday apartment. The witnesses said the man was white, 20 to 40 years old and of medium build. He had short brown hair, was clean-shaven and of medium height, they added."
UglyTruth ago
No, the BBC is not the final arbiter of truth. The BBC has a history of covering up for paedophiles.
http://forum.clonehost.net/post/378
No, I think that they said what they were told to say.
comeonpeople ago
lol...so the police were told to release two images that look like the Podestas, but were also told to say they were images of one suspect?
You sound supersmart and rational.
UglyTruth ago
Facts are facts. The two images are of two different men, therefore there are two different suspects, which contradicts what the police said.
comeonpeople ago
Yes, facts are facts. The fact is that a husband and wife saw one man in his 20s-40s carrying a child. The police took their descriptions and did two different efit renderings, presumably one from the husband's description and one from the wife's.
lol @ the police releasing two images and then lying to say there was only one man. Why the fuck wouldn't they just release one image or not release any images if they were going to lie about it? Use your head.
UglyTruth ago
So why would they use different systems for each image? One clearly has higher resolution that the other. The Smiths said that they didn't get a good look at the man carrying the girl, how is is that the efits had detail like moles and a pressure mark caused by wearing classes?
Because the investigator(s) produced two images and the McCanns knew that. They didn't want to be implicated in a coverup, so they force-fitted the evidence to match the official narrative. The police sat on those images for years before finally releasing them, and they didn't get published on the Guardian's website until 2013, 6 years after Madeleine disappeared.
comeonpeople ago
So somehow the McCanns knew about the two images? The police were forced to release both images for some reason because the McCanns knew about them, but had no qualms about lying about it being one suspect and not two? The McCanns would have blown the lid on the two images, but kept quiet about the number of suspects? And same with the irish couple?
lol @ the fucking efit having "a pressure mark caused by wearing glasses", as though that's something ANY witness would notice. You are seeing what you want to see, you could not make it any more clear. Who exactly do you think the witnesses were if not the Smiths? Who were these witnesses that were close enough and studied the suspects long enough to notice a tiny mole and a "pressure mark caused by wearing glasses"?
UglyTruth ago
Are you implying that the pressure mark isn't there?
http://forum.clonehost.net/post/269
comeonpeople ago
I'm not implying it, I'm saying it flat-out.
comeonpeople ago
Yes, and it's not an implication. You are seeing what you want to see. If you think the couple saw this guy from two feet away and immediately noticed his "pressure mark" you're high. In any case lol @ the police including that in any case.
UglyTruth ago
Reposting for a bigger audience. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1442071