As has been posted many times, these are two renderings based on a description of ONE suspect. An irish couple saw ONE man and said he was 20-40. So the fact that the police renderings happen to look like two different people, who each happen to look like one of the (60+ year old) Podesta brothers, is entirely a bizarre coincidence.
No. While they have changed their mind about how many people may have been involved, this does not mean that they changed their mind about who these two efits represent.
Again: ""Mary and Martin Smith, from Ireland, told police they saw a man carrying a child...two e-fit images of the man, compiled by police from descriptions given by Mr and Mrs Smith, were released by Scotland Yard" -- The Telegraph
I mean, this is not debatable. It is stated very plainly. The fact that so many of these sites continue to repeat this nonsense necessarily indicates that these sites are either deliberately spreading misinformation, or are staffed by people who are beyond stupid.
view the rest of the comments →
comeonpeople ago
As has been posted many times, these are two renderings based on a description of ONE suspect. An irish couple saw ONE man and said he was 20-40. So the fact that the police renderings happen to look like two different people, who each happen to look like one of the (60+ year old) Podesta brothers, is entirely a bizarre coincidence.
TopGun ago
I believe that has been debunked. The police aren't certain that the drawings are of the same person.
Read more: http://livingresistance.com/2016/11/18/podestas-involved-mccanns-abduction-factual-analysis/
comeonpeople ago
No. While they have changed their mind about how many people may have been involved, this does not mean that they changed their mind about who these two efits represent.
Again: ""Mary and Martin Smith, from Ireland, told police they saw a man carrying a child...two e-fit images of the man, compiled by police from descriptions given by Mr and Mrs Smith, were released by Scotland Yard" -- The Telegraph
I mean, this is not debatable. It is stated very plainly. The fact that so many of these sites continue to repeat this nonsense necessarily indicates that these sites are either deliberately spreading misinformation, or are staffed by people who are beyond stupid.