You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

xeemee ago

Epstein is a known Mossad asset ...

if that's true, fine - prove it out, but my argument is that there's a massive difference between exposing such ties critically and logically and through a chain of evidence which connects Epstein to the Mossad rather than stating 'it's the jews', the latter of which is going to be very damaging - let the readers figure out the bigger picture

PizzaPastaz ago

How about you investigate the Italian mafia without ever taking into account their Italian customs.

You wouldn't get very far.

Listen @xeemee, you're telling people to ignore the root ideology at the centre of these Satanic pedophile rings. Judaism is the religion at the centre of Satanism. Satanism is a wing of Judaism.

Jews have been doing these things for literally thousands of years, and also in the modern day era. There is an established pattern with Jews being involved in Satanic political pedophile rings. Judaism is at the centre of this stuff.

You're basically telling people to ignore the root cause of the pedophile rings because " Christians rape kids too! And because the Holocaust!!!"

You're a coward or a shill.

xeemee ago

How about you investigate the Italian mafia without ever taking into account their Italian customs.

i agree, but there is a huge difference between the consequences and blow-back of exposing the Italian mafia verses the Jewish mafia

... you're telling people to ignore the root ideology at the centre of these Satanic pedophile rings.

bullshit - i said no such thing - as a matter of fact i said and implied quite the opposite...

i don't think it's wise to overtly make this connection at this time -- pursue these matters privately, yes, by all means - obviously every lead must be followed and every name exposed, regardless of who is implicated

by "overtly", i meant creating posts with 'it's the jews' titles - connecting the names of people with organizations, intel communities, religious institutions, etc., fine, but i think pinning on the jews in an overt manner is a mistake and since i'm sure you would agree that the stamp of antisemitism would not be a healthy procurement in this investigation, why trot it out at the outset when there isn't even any proof that i'm aware of to make the connection between jewry and pg?

and if there is proof, then don't tell us that "Jews have been doing these things for literally thousands of years" - post links and resources that makes this case specific to this investigation and, if you cannot, then you've admitted the lack of evidence to support your claim

and ...

there will be plenty of opportunity to expand on the details after this is all fleshed out

there are probably hundreds of directions that could be forked from PG, but the key right now, i think, is to make the basic case: these children were sexually abused and here is who did it

you can't investigate something by naming the guilty party and then attempting to prove your guess, no matter how educated it may be, was right