I just registered to suggest something you great and brave researchers didn't think of:
SURROGACY.
I firmly believe surrogate maternity is used to "produce toys" for those sickos (and satanists). Check this:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2355194/U-S-Australian-citizen-sentenced-40-years-buying-boy-sole-purpose-exploitation.html
It happened, and it went on MSM too. And since that baby was "bought" in a surrogacy center in Russia, mr.Putin then prohibited surrogacy business to gays and foreigners. That's why the whole world began to call him "omophobic", and all the leftists and Soros friends NGOs got hysterical.
Surrogacy is another abyss of horrors, and it's fully connected to child traffic worldwide. I'd look into that.
view the rest of the comments →
ZunarJ5 ago
Note that Kate Middleton has never been pregnant either. It goes back centuries that the Royal family have used surrogates.
Yuser_Manuel ago
But why do they use surrogates?
srayzie ago
This is the first I've heard about Kate Middleton. I looked it up. People say she looked too good or that her stomach was still just as big after leaving the hospital. That's just opinion. Every woman is different and of course she will look her very best. What makes you believe that?
podesta_pedosta ago
I don't think so. My wife's had 3 babies and her stomach was still huge for a few months after birth.