Nah. That's silly to think. I'm totally open to thoughts of all kinds of conspiring and manipulation tactics used by media, but a single article giving a voice to a pedophile, assuming I remember the article people are talking about, is no proof of them having a pro-pedophile agenda. I would say that's probably one of the few pieces of evidence they have that they aren't constantly fucking biased about reporting.
view the rest of the comments →
ZooBot ago
I think showing that NYT is trying to normalize it, even in 2014, could lead to questions as to why they are not covering PG now.
AKnightAlone ago
Nah. That's silly to think. I'm totally open to thoughts of all kinds of conspiring and manipulation tactics used by media, but a single article giving a voice to a pedophile, assuming I remember the article people are talking about, is no proof of them having a pro-pedophile agenda. I would say that's probably one of the few pieces of evidence they have that they aren't constantly fucking biased about reporting.