Does not matter, entire subverses have been disable on voat in the past for violating the user agreement. I don't give a shit what drawings you like but you posting real children after your fetishist rape porn means you deserve to die.
fine i'll delete it if it bugs you that much. but i suggest you go online and read about this. jena mallone herself came forward and said she was never abused during the production of the film. that's not real sex. it's called stimulated sex. this isn't a video of a real girl getting abused or something.
Except Mens Reas is enough to convict based on the Miller Test. Which would decide if the content is indecent upon reviewing his possession of questionably clothed children and the said video of a child being raped stored and transmitted along side lolicon while he was posting such content for sexual gratification.
Even if the state does not criminalize explicit lolicon images the images of real children can be deemed indecent by a jury thus gaining his a child porn conviction for the real media and possibly the lolicon.
Just like people who posses and create photos of naturist children even if not posed can still be judged indecent via Mens Reas / Miller test and lead to a child porn conviction. Context is key with internet history and the content stored together helps the jury decide intent and merit.
view the rest of the comments →
Octocopter ago
@puttitout @cynabuns
Protect Kids: You agree not to post any child pornography or sexually suggestive content involving minors.
fuark_auf ago
it's from a mainstream movie -> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0115633/
Octocopter ago
Does not matter, entire subverses have been disable on voat in the past for violating the user agreement. I don't give a shit what drawings you like but you posting real children after your fetishist rape porn means you deserve to die.
fuark_auf ago
fine i'll delete it if it bugs you that much. but i suggest you go online and read about this. jena mallone herself came forward and said she was never abused during the production of the film. that's not real sex. it's called stimulated sex. this isn't a video of a real girl getting abused or something.
Octocopter ago
No what needs to happen is you getting banned for sexualizing a real living minor, with a rape fetish no less.
You even posted it to NSFW while you are on a spree of posting rape and loli porn clearly posting it for sexual intent.
turtlesarepureevil ago
Mens reas is not enough to prosecute. What illegal act was committed?
Octocopter ago
Except Mens Reas is enough to convict based on the Miller Test. Which would decide if the content is indecent upon reviewing his possession of questionably clothed children and the said video of a child being raped stored and transmitted along side lolicon while he was posting such content for sexual gratification.
Even if the state does not criminalize explicit lolicon images the images of real children can be deemed indecent by a jury thus gaining his a child porn conviction for the real media and possibly the lolicon.
Just like people who posses and create photos of naturist children even if not posed can still be judged indecent via Mens Reas / Miller test and lead to a child porn conviction. Context is key with internet history and the content stored together helps the jury decide intent and merit.