Because of contamination? How long does a virus survive on a container? How long does it take for a ship to go from China to Australia? This panic makes people more sick than a virus could ever do.
And what if SARS-CoV-2 is not a new virus created by a bad bat at a Chinese fish market, but version 2.0 of SARS-CoV? In this case it would be a weapon, released near a fish market in a foreign country to mask the origin and to trick us into thinking that this virus is completely new. Is this the reason why they changed the name from SARS-CoV-2 to CovID-19? If this is the case we have to better figure out who did it, before they release version 3.0.
"And what if SARS-CoV-2 is not a new virus created by a bad bat at a Chinese fish market, but version 2.0 of SARS-CoV?"
That's literally what it is. They called it SARS-CoV-2 because of the genetic similarities to the original SARS-CoV virus.
"Is this the reason why they changed the name from SARS-CoV-2 to CovID-19?"
They changed the name from nCoV-2019 to SARS-CoV-2 when the figured out the genetics of it.
"Covid-19" is the propaganda name of the disease SARS-CoV-2 gives you, not the virus itself. Rather than every other virus being named for where it was discovered (such as West Nile, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, Lyme Disease, Ross River Fever, Omsk Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola, Middle-Eastern Respiratory Syndrome, Valley Fever, Marburg Virus, Norovirus, Zika, Japanese Encephalitis, German Measles, Spanish Flu, Lassa Fever, Legionnaire's Disease, etc.), "Covid-19" was chosen to allow the CCP to save face. Why? Because the Director General of the WHO (a communist terrorist who is not a doctor) is Xi Jinping's puppet. China was part of a massive push to get him elected over other candidates, is balls-deep in his home country's economy, and he owes Jinping favors.
tl;dr - SARS-CoV-2 is the name of the virus. "Covid-19" is the name given to help China avoid blame for it.
I don't think the WHO is under Chinese control, they are controlled by globalists that were already established when China had not much power. China has its own globalist deep state, but Xi is not part of them. Otherwise Trump would not treat him as a competitor, but as an enemy. If we reduce this all to "China is the culprit - case closed" then we could miss where and when it started (SARS 1.0?) and who did it and could do it again. Remember that the CIA incorporated German and Japanese biological weapon experts long ago, and had already 200 labs around the world when China had none.
Long story short, the Director General of the WHO has a vested interest in keeping China happy, meaning he's under their control. By extension, that puts the WHO itself under Chinese control. The WHO was parroting the official CCP party line about "no human to human transmission found" when this all started. They also happily spouted every other lie China has told about this thing.
The original SARS-CoV originated in China as well. This new variant has been known since late 2015.
"...recent metagenomics studies have identified sequences of closely related SARS-like viruses circulating in Chinese bat populations that may pose a future threat."
China may not be the ultimate culprit, but their poor initial handling, their covering up the severity of the issue, and their continued attempts to shift blame and save face are directly responsible for the current situation. And aiding them the whole time was the WHO, serving as a propaganda outlet rather than doing their jobs.
Yes, China invested heavily in Ethiopia, built a brand new railway there. But I think the terrorist background of the general points more in the CIA direction than to China - China builds infrastructure to get African resources while the CIA diverts Nato weapons to warlords to get them.
Anyway, I think the WHO downplayed the menance not to please China, but to accelerate the spread of the virus until it's too late and they can position themselves as our saviors and the core of the new world government.
This future-threat article is very interesting: They modified the SARS-CoV with a sequence taken from a bat CoV so it could infect humans better than the original virus. They say that they have done it to prove that other CoV from bats are a threat, but maybe they have just created the beta version of SARS-CoV-2.
I know, but why has the WHO changed the official wording? They haven't called SARS CovID-3. The WHO called it "2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)" and the media uses "COVID-19 virus". Words matter, they set the boundaries of our thoughts. They want us to believe that CovID-19 is something completely new and showed us fish market pictures to proof it.
view the rest of the comments →
verboten ago
Because of contamination? How long does a virus survive on a container? How long does it take for a ship to go from China to Australia? This panic makes people more sick than a virus could ever do.
cyclops1771 ago
Because China created this virus, released it on the world, and then lied about it and covered it up.
Plus, fuck China.
verboten ago
And what if SARS-CoV-2 is not a new virus created by a bad bat at a Chinese fish market, but version 2.0 of SARS-CoV? In this case it would be a weapon, released near a fish market in a foreign country to mask the origin and to trick us into thinking that this virus is completely new. Is this the reason why they changed the name from SARS-CoV-2 to CovID-19? If this is the case we have to better figure out who did it, before they release version 3.0.
uvulectomy ago
That's literally what it is. They called it SARS-CoV-2 because of the genetic similarities to the original SARS-CoV virus.
They changed the name from nCoV-2019 to SARS-CoV-2 when the figured out the genetics of it.
"Covid-19" is the propaganda name of the disease SARS-CoV-2 gives you, not the virus itself. Rather than every other virus being named for where it was discovered (such as West Nile, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, Lyme Disease, Ross River Fever, Omsk Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola, Middle-Eastern Respiratory Syndrome, Valley Fever, Marburg Virus, Norovirus, Zika, Japanese Encephalitis, German Measles, Spanish Flu, Lassa Fever, Legionnaire's Disease, etc.), "Covid-19" was chosen to allow the CCP to save face. Why? Because the Director General of the WHO (a communist terrorist who is not a doctor) is Xi Jinping's puppet. China was part of a massive push to get him elected over other candidates, is balls-deep in his home country's economy, and he owes Jinping favors.
tl;dr - SARS-CoV-2 is the name of the virus. "Covid-19" is the name given to help China avoid blame for it.
verboten ago
I don't think the WHO is under Chinese control, they are controlled by globalists that were already established when China had not much power. China has its own globalist deep state, but Xi is not part of them. Otherwise Trump would not treat him as a competitor, but as an enemy. If we reduce this all to "China is the culprit - case closed" then we could miss where and when it started (SARS 1.0?) and who did it and could do it again. Remember that the CIA incorporated German and Japanese biological weapon experts long ago, and had already 200 labs around the world when China had none.
uvulectomy ago
Sourced rundown of WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom's dealings as a high-ranking Ethiopian politician.
CNN piece on China getting balls-deep in Ethiopia's economy.
China Daily talking about getting involved in Ethiopia.
Long story short, the Director General of the WHO has a vested interest in keeping China happy, meaning he's under their control. By extension, that puts the WHO itself under Chinese control. The WHO was parroting the official CCP party line about "no human to human transmission found" when this all started. They also happily spouted every other lie China has told about this thing.
The original SARS-CoV originated in China as well. This new variant has been known since late 2015.
China may not be the ultimate culprit, but their poor initial handling, their covering up the severity of the issue, and their continued attempts to shift blame and save face are directly responsible for the current situation. And aiding them the whole time was the WHO, serving as a propaganda outlet rather than doing their jobs.
verboten ago
Yes, China invested heavily in Ethiopia, built a brand new railway there. But I think the terrorist background of the general points more in the CIA direction than to China - China builds infrastructure to get African resources while the CIA diverts Nato weapons to warlords to get them.
Anyway, I think the WHO downplayed the menance not to please China, but to accelerate the spread of the virus until it's too late and they can position themselves as our saviors and the core of the new world government.
This future-threat article is very interesting: They modified the SARS-CoV with a sequence taken from a bat CoV so it could infect humans better than the original virus. They say that they have done it to prove that other CoV from bats are a threat, but maybe they have just created the beta version of SARS-CoV-2.
cyclops1771 ago
The virus contaminent is SARS-CoV-2. The resulting disease is CovID-19.
You don't "catch a CoVID-19", you catch SARS-CoV-2, which leads to CoVID-19, the symptomatic result of the SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The virus = SARS-CoV-2
The symptoms/disease = CoVID-19
verboten ago
I know, but why has the WHO changed the official wording? They haven't called SARS CovID-3. The WHO called it "2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)" and the media uses "COVID-19 virus". Words matter, they set the boundaries of our thoughts. They want us to believe that CovID-19 is something completely new and showed us fish market pictures to proof it.
cyclops1771 ago
I think it even started as Wuhan 2019 novel Coronavirus and then that became the name.
However, every scientific (non-media, non-governmental) article or paper I have read on the subject has labeled it as SARS-CoV-2. Every one.