Looks like myself, and I am sure all the other users can selectively delete anything from their past. This idea didn't even occur to me until recently, and sure enough, I have the delete option on even my very first post or comment ever made.
Seems like there should be no reason to selectively remove or scorch earth an account's history unless it was to surreptitiously hide it. Might make users like our new builder, Virge; who has a nearly 4 year old account, with no history, suddenly becoming not only active, but very opinionated; seem less suspiciously, glow niggerly. Especially when they receive accolades from the admin. No way I can prove any user has done this, but why let that be an option? Want to escape from your faggotry, then your old account should be forfeit instead of being available to be used in nefarious ways.
I mean, if we are going to be worried about vote manipulation, shouldn't we be concerned about manipulation of aged accounts? some of you may disagree with giving any credence to an accounts age, but like it or not, many of us draw vague, but important conclusions from the age of an account, and it's posting/comment history.
Sadiq_Khan ago
https://voat.co/v/AskVoat/3245098/18860472/10#18860472
https://youtu.be/z0A76wI2y14
stay strong & safe -dial
Sadiq_Khan ago
what @virgire do hide identity tho?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLPf4Q381P0
Alcoholics_R_Us ago
Reported for spam
DrSelfAppointed ago
My post has nothing to do with todays drama, Faggot. I only noticed this when Putt publicly jerked him and a few others off. It's weird for an account that old to have zero history, to suddenly become some top fixture of Voat within a few new posts. It's his sudden vocal interest about the goings on of Voat that amps that up. His opinion either way to any of this is irrelevant, what is, is the oddity of his account. And it is odd.
But hey, I guess I can almost forgive a Q account for being an idiot.