There are all kinds of comments and content submitted. Who is any one person to determine the quality? It's the communities decision. The admin doesn't have the time (money) to review the reported content. Granted it could be automated to some extent, but at the end of the day to prevent someone from being brigaded by bots a person would have to put a fair amount of time into reviewing the person being reported and the people reporting them. Personally I'd rather see other site features be built out. You really have to prioritize features when you have limited resources.
I might hope so too. It'd be great to have this place back to normal again. /all has been destroyed with Q crap from what I've seen, and it's an all out trolling war between pre-existing users and new users to pill them out of their qtardation. Q has always been about wasting peoples time. This is just another. If some people want to take the time and effort, by all means. But there is real shit going on in the world and this is on of the few places left on the internet where it can be shared and discussions about it can take place.
Maybe @PuttItOut could set up a q.voat.co walled garden for these people I think that would solve a lot of the problems people have been having over the past week while still allowing him to hold on to the new users. There may be some way to build out features to integrate the migrants over time, but this is essentially a hostile board takeover. The honeymoon ended in a few short days. This is really causing a lot of problems within the community.
Just visit /v/protectvoat, there's loads of links there to people openly asking for upvotes, and creating threads/entire subverses with no other purpose than farming.
I think the blatant demands for Upvoats is all that could reasonably covered by this rule, not so much the posts that everyone knows will get upvoats. One is clearly a rule violation, the other is an example of knowing your target audience.
view the rest of the comments →
Mumbleberry ago
100% this!!!!
fluhthreeex ago
^ reported for vote farming
There are all kinds of comments and content submitted. Who is any one person to determine the quality? It's the communities decision. The admin doesn't have the time (money) to review the reported content. Granted it could be automated to some extent, but at the end of the day to prevent someone from being brigaded by bots a person would have to put a fair amount of time into reviewing the person being reported and the people reporting them. Personally I'd rather see other site features be built out. You really have to prioritize features when you have limited resources.
WillGreeley ago
HAhahahahaha Community? Like HRC's 'Village'? That community?? Hope Q takes a Que and denounces this 'Crap'!!
fluhthreeex ago
I might hope so too. It'd be great to have this place back to normal again. /all has been destroyed with Q crap from what I've seen, and it's an all out trolling war between pre-existing users and new users to pill them out of their qtardation. Q has always been about wasting peoples time. This is just another. If some people want to take the time and effort, by all means. But there is real shit going on in the world and this is on of the few places left on the internet where it can be shared and discussions about it can take place.
Maybe @PuttItOut could set up a q.voat.co walled garden for these people I think that would solve a lot of the problems people have been having over the past week while still allowing him to hold on to the new users. There may be some way to build out features to integrate the migrants over time, but this is essentially a hostile board takeover. The honeymoon ended in a few short days. This is really causing a lot of problems within the community.
Broc_Lia ago
Granted it can be vague, but there are many explicit examples which can and should be reported.
Gypsynurse ago
Example please
Broc_Lia ago
Just visit /v/protectvoat, there's loads of links there to people openly asking for upvotes, and creating threads/entire subverses with no other purpose than farming.
Mumbleberry ago
So, "Please upvoat me" is ok in your book? But yeah, it would be difficult to implement fairly.
FrozenFire74 ago
I think the blatant demands for Upvoats is all that could reasonably covered by this rule, not so much the posts that everyone knows will get upvoats. One is clearly a rule violation, the other is an example of knowing your target audience.
Mumbleberry ago
Works for me.
Sosacms ago
Yes, all comments are equal, because all can be ignored equally. The only exception would be spam or harmful links.