theoldones ago

no, it's one of the divination skillsets i know of

ex-redd ago

how do you feel about this scenario? [how will you react?]

ex-redd ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIqfQ-khI5s

I always looked at them allegorically

ex-redd ago

don't get me wrong: they live

theoldones ago

this is true. divination tools are live not dead

ex-redd ago

so I am looking for a mech soldier image of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbmS3tQJ7Os

ex-redd ago

but we shall not bear their burden

ex-redd ago

boise

ex-redd ago

let's start our own place

theoldones ago

closest match might be kek already, but i've found he does more then he tells

ex-redd ago

boise is the new age

theoldones ago

boise, idado? i am confused

ex-redd ago

look up in an almanac (demographics) why

theoldones ago

ah, i see now.

ex-redd ago

my friend: I could give you the whole story--but not now.

ex-redd ago

carl jung and something about synchronisity

Dortex ago

Did you know u/theoldones begged for child porn,repeatedly, and again for good measure, then had a mental breakdown when he got called out for it?

ex-redd ago

meh, he seems pretty legit

Dortex ago

I agree with that statement at its face. Though we probably don't mean the same thing.

ex-redd ago

I think you are slandering more-or-less. I looked at the links: not much there.

he seems to me as a human, with actual care toward the cause

Dortex ago

It's only slander if it's not true.

ex-redd ago

ok, what about: presented in a way as to intentionally de-fame out of context?

Dortex ago

I don't think that quite works when the statement plainly describes the facts and links to the entire discussion directly.

ex-redd ago

you stated one thing: the links didn't back it up

Dortex ago

Me: He begged for child porn.

You: Naw man. I ain't see that.

TOO:

okay. prove it by doing it. you just said it was legal.

go ahead, post that naked kid pic, we can wait.

.

i aint seeing a naked kid pic, i'm starting to think you, might have been lying...

.

i dare you to post a photo of a naked, unclothed child then.

You sure you're not part nigger?

ex-redd ago

look, i'm not going to challenge you: I just didn't see it, where you directed me. Personally, all that makes me uncomfortable: i'm not going to look deeply into it.

and the dude seems legit.

he's always after the pedos more than any other user: go to v/protectvoat if you have real evidence others will look into

I'm done on it

Dortex ago

i'm not going to look deeply into it.

I did it for you. Don't worry.

go to v/protectvoat

They've known for over a month. He keeps spamming the place. Have a nice day. <3

ex-redd ago

I'll look into it when i have more energy. Not the best time right now.

theoldones ago

https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3215581/18577113/

Yeah, the linked comments don't prove @theoldones is a pedophile. If you click into them and look at the context, it's obvious theoldones is asking Decidueye to put his account where his mouth is. Dortex is trying to smear him for this. It's an intentionally dishonest trick, and for it to work relies on people either not clicking the links or only paying slight attention to the contents. That said, many will do one of those two and the smear will work on them. It's a skilled manipulation, I'll give it that much. I didn't actually realize how dishonest and manipulative Dortex was until seeing it for myself. Mumbleberry did try to warn me, and I should have listened to him.

Dortex ago

don't prove @theoldones is a pedophile.

Changing goalposts. I accused you of being a CP solicitor.

If you click into them and look at the context, it's obvious theoldones is asking Decidueye to put his account where his mouth is

Need me to provide your own admission that your intentions were a sting or the other times you asked other users to post child pornography? Need me to provide the DOJ link where it makes it abundantly clear how retarded you are?

It's an intentionally dishonest trick, and for it to work relies on people either not clicking the links or only paying slight attention to the contents.

Anyone can click the parent button in the links Dortex provided and observe that you use (((pilpul))) regarding definitions so you can act like a SJW. Going to accuse me and @Wickerman of being shills of /u/Aged next you damn loon?

theoldones ago

all i have to do is point out you're an ugly sheep-stealing chupacabra taconigger pedophile

Dortex ago

And all I have to do is point out you beg for child porn.

theoldones ago

go back to stealing farm animals and terrifying children.

https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3215581/18577113/

Dortex ago

Isn't it weird he keeps vanishing now that you got modded on his sub? 🤔

theoldones ago

go back to mexico.

theoldones ago

m8, one time the runes said a "thorn", and a hornet then divebombed me with a sting for no damn reason whatsoever

i've known beforehand when a family member got into a car crash

fate is a powerful thing to know

ex-redd ago

I was wasted: but seriously, how do runes work? is this along the same lines? got a surce?

my focus was always on philosophy--synchronicity is kind of a pet project

theoldones ago

https://voat.co/v/BloodOfEurope/2836212/

http://runesecrets.com/

https://voat.co/v/BloodOfEurope/2847592/

https://voat.co/v/BloodOfEurope/2849579/

[get/make yourself a rune set]

[and then some historical books on runes from scholars maybe too]

the symbols call to those on the other side. invoke, prove, cut, color and stain. divinate and ward and summon

ex-redd ago

thanks