No site in america has ever been pulled for drawn porn, hentai or loli/lolicon, and neither has google ever de-listed any website for those reasons, besides those facts there is no CP on Voat and there are websites that are run exclusively on hentai that host loli porn, most having a ".com" domain people aren't using voat to share CP, and aged is almost certainly just an autismo who spends all day in front of his computer co-lating his favorite porn and lewd images just like the faggot who shares cuck porn on 4chan.
Banning Aged wont mean anything unless he has violated a rule and seeing as he has violated no law, no policy from google, or any site or subverse rules, he's not even worth the worry considering he gets downvoated into oblivion by our community. This whole faggoty drama could be solve by two new rules: posting low effort or off topic smut is against the rules (low effort means if it isn't something you verifiably made or bought, and isn't subverse related cosplay), rule the next: demanding in public, or through mod spam, a user who has violated no rules be banned is a tamp ban, three strikes is a perma ban.
People are tired of hearing about a user whom almost no-one sees his "content" and even more tired of the regular faces who come here to scream about him.
While none of what you said is likely untrue,you didn't seem to grasp the point. It's smear ammo. They use the promulgation of these lewd images to ruin the reputation of the sites, not necessarily literally "shut them down". That there's some internet words, bud.
I used to think like this, back at the very start of Gamergate in 2014. I was wrong then and it took me some months to learn it; by extension, you are wrong now. This argument is what is known as "muh PR," and your concerns about "smear ammo" only matter in an environment in which there exists somewhat objective, truthful reporting and intellectually honest argumentation, with little to no propaganda. That's not what we have. They will lie and smear the site however they want regardless of whether said ammo actually exists. Additionally there is nothing at all to stop any of them from creating an account and posting the ammo themselves. Your rationale is flawed because its underlying assumption is wrong. They're going to badmouth the site anyway, regardless, no matter what. The existence of "smear ammo" or lack thereof makes no difference whatsoever.
But this is a tangential topic from the issue at hand. What Aged posts isn't the problem itself, it's whether he breaks rules, because there are a few very emotional witch hunters who want to ban him based on identity, rather than based on wrongful actions.
I don't think that's something to worry about, all of the festering wounds of the internet where this new right wing swing came up from are filled with porn, especially loli. It's sub divided usually not very often successfully, in fact Voat is the most smut free and free of mod/admin drama hold for right wingers, natsocs, or just regular folks on the web today.
I get your point that porn might drive people away but I also think those people being driven away are often pearl clutching, purity spiraling, and weak minded if their mental fortitude cannot resist or hold against ubiquitous lewd images. For context on my position I'm for shutting down every kike run porn domain, killing all the porn kikes etc but plenty of places have porn industries without yids running them because porn is an unyielding element of the natural condition. Conditioning a resistance to it in individuals is a more valid use of mental effort than trying to catch and shut down 100% of it. Essentially what I'm saying is what libertarians say about drugs and prostitution, let it flow freely and educate people on the dangers instead of putting effort into shutting it down everywhere, let the degenerate have their places and spend time otherwise spent on trying to shut it down on trying to cure the afflicted and develop the mental fortitude of the rest. We need natural selection and predation and we also need human empathy and a willingness to help those who will ask.
I'm not saying v/gaming is a place for smut either, we should have a rule against low effort smut posting.
considering he gets downvoated into oblivion by our community.
I'm unconvinced by that. Before Putt gave into the purity mob, his posts were hovering around the positive single digits. After he got unbanned, suddenly all his gaming posts got actual attention and went hard negative. My guess is the purity mob got kicked into a frenzy and started voting on a sub they don't actually frequent. Alternatively, these sweaty faggots made bunch of alt accounts to brigade him.
This may be true but I know I'm certainly not in on the purity mob and I downvoat aged wherever I see his shit and if I trust the words of everyone who has stood against his ban, excepting one faggot who stuck around from the failed r/animemes raid, they all downvoat him when they see him too.
I also know some guys just like seeing anime tiddies and that's what aged is trying to appeal to by posting here.
I vote up all his shit almost out of spite at this point. While I'm sure one of two people genuinely don't like his stuff, it's hard to deny that most of it really is just a bunch of sweaty losers who literally go to loli subs to vote him down. I can only assume they touch themselves, then vote down as penance.
Don't think for a moment that I think anyone that downvotes him is a purity mob. I'm sure plenty of people genuinely aren't into loli. But then, they're not the ones at the loli subs waiting to vote on his posts.
view the rest of the comments →
NotHereForPizza ago
This is moronic... @aged is their "shut them down via cp" shill.
Obrez ago
No site in america has ever been pulled for drawn porn, hentai or loli/lolicon, and neither has google ever de-listed any website for those reasons, besides those facts there is no CP on Voat and there are websites that are run exclusively on hentai that host loli porn, most having a ".com" domain people aren't using voat to share CP, and aged is almost certainly just an autismo who spends all day in front of his computer co-lating his favorite porn and lewd images just like the faggot who shares cuck porn on 4chan.
Banning Aged wont mean anything unless he has violated a rule and seeing as he has violated no law, no policy from google, or any site or subverse rules, he's not even worth the worry considering he gets downvoated into oblivion by our community. This whole faggoty drama could be solve by two new rules: posting low effort or off topic smut is against the rules (low effort means if it isn't something you verifiably made or bought, and isn't subverse related cosplay), rule the next: demanding in public, or through mod spam, a user who has violated no rules be banned is a tamp ban, three strikes is a perma ban.
People are tired of hearing about a user whom almost no-one sees his "content" and even more tired of the regular faces who come here to scream about him.
NotHereForPizza ago
It's funny you take this angle.
While none of what you said is likely untrue,you didn't seem to grasp the point. It's smear ammo. They use the promulgation of these lewd images to ruin the reputation of the sites, not necessarily literally "shut them down". That there's some internet words, bud.
shrink ago
I used to think like this, back at the very start of Gamergate in 2014. I was wrong then and it took me some months to learn it; by extension, you are wrong now. This argument is what is known as "muh PR," and your concerns about "smear ammo" only matter in an environment in which there exists somewhat objective, truthful reporting and intellectually honest argumentation, with little to no propaganda. That's not what we have. They will lie and smear the site however they want regardless of whether said ammo actually exists. Additionally there is nothing at all to stop any of them from creating an account and posting the ammo themselves. Your rationale is flawed because its underlying assumption is wrong. They're going to badmouth the site anyway, regardless, no matter what. The existence of "smear ammo" or lack thereof makes no difference whatsoever.
But this is a tangential topic from the issue at hand. What Aged posts isn't the problem itself, it's whether he breaks rules, because there are a few very emotional witch hunters who want to ban him based on identity, rather than based on wrongful actions.
NotHereForPizza ago
Wrong. They anchor things with certain techniques that trigger specific responses within the audience.
It may have been a bad explanation, but this shit has been happening since before gamer gate, bud. Welcome to the internet.
Obrez ago
I don't think that's something to worry about, all of the festering wounds of the internet where this new right wing swing came up from are filled with porn, especially loli. It's sub divided usually not very often successfully, in fact Voat is the most smut free and free of mod/admin drama hold for right wingers, natsocs, or just regular folks on the web today.
I get your point that porn might drive people away but I also think those people being driven away are often pearl clutching, purity spiraling, and weak minded if their mental fortitude cannot resist or hold against ubiquitous lewd images. For context on my position I'm for shutting down every kike run porn domain, killing all the porn kikes etc but plenty of places have porn industries without yids running them because porn is an unyielding element of the natural condition. Conditioning a resistance to it in individuals is a more valid use of mental effort than trying to catch and shut down 100% of it. Essentially what I'm saying is what libertarians say about drugs and prostitution, let it flow freely and educate people on the dangers instead of putting effort into shutting it down everywhere, let the degenerate have their places and spend time otherwise spent on trying to shut it down on trying to cure the afflicted and develop the mental fortitude of the rest. We need natural selection and predation and we also need human empathy and a willingness to help those who will ask.
I'm not saying v/gaming is a place for smut either, we should have a rule against low effort smut posting.
NotHereForPizza ago
These things have been happening for decades on the internet. This isn't a new phenomenon.
Dortex ago
I'm unconvinced by that. Before Putt gave into the purity mob, his posts were hovering around the positive single digits. After he got unbanned, suddenly all his gaming posts got actual attention and went hard negative. My guess is the purity mob got kicked into a frenzy and started voting on a sub they don't actually frequent. Alternatively, these sweaty faggots made bunch of alt accounts to brigade him.
Obrez ago
This may be true but I know I'm certainly not in on the purity mob and I downvoat aged wherever I see his shit and if I trust the words of everyone who has stood against his ban, excepting one faggot who stuck around from the failed r/animemes raid, they all downvoat him when they see him too.
I also know some guys just like seeing anime tiddies and that's what aged is trying to appeal to by posting here.
Dortex ago
I vote up all his shit almost out of spite at this point. While I'm sure one of two people genuinely don't like his stuff, it's hard to deny that most of it really is just a bunch of sweaty losers who literally go to loli subs to vote him down. I can only assume they touch themselves, then vote down as penance.
Don't think for a moment that I think anyone that downvotes him is a purity mob. I'm sure plenty of people genuinely aren't into loli. But then, they're not the ones at the loli subs waiting to vote on his posts.