ACTUAL traditional women would want to protect the image of a child and wouldn't fight to share with them on a board with pedophiles .. traditional women wouldn't be spreading photos of other peoples kids around the internet in the first place.
I was using that as an example of what would be lost if we banned photos of children all together. You assumed I meant in some kind of pornographic manner... I meant in any matter. The person is calling for no posting pictures of kids of ANY kind.
No I assume pedophiles can turn any photo of a child into whatever they want.. I don't see voat as a place where photos of children need to be shared at all. I'm fine with losing photos of happy families off traditional wives if it means the pedophiles will not be jacking off to innocent children on voat.
What does that have to do with preventing pedophiles from jacking off to photos of kids on voat?
If I wanted to look at photos of happy families I wouldn't think or need to come here. Why do we need to share photos that pedophiles will like on this website at all, and why do we need their photos of kids in bathing suits as a sign of our free speech? I was thinking if we had one rule of no photos of children then it would be up to the mods to enforce, no?
Your thinking is drastically wrong in my opinion. What if I was out with a niece and she caught a giant fish and the only picture I took was of her holding it. I now can't post it thanks to your new rules. Banning pictures of children is the dumbest attempt at a solution to this.
In my opinion you're a shitty fucking uncle if you'd put your niece's face on an anonymous internet forum. But I see you're intentionally missing my point, hope you die pedo.
view the rest of the comments →
slimanus ago
Can we just have one rule that infringes on our free speech, no posting photos of kids on voat?
CantBuySkills ago
Fuck you. And fuck no.
Do you want v/traditionalwives on your ass? Because that's how you get v/traditionalwives on your ass.
slimanus ago
ACTUAL traditional women would want to protect the image of a child and wouldn't fight to share with them on a board with pedophiles .. traditional women wouldn't be spreading photos of other peoples kids around the internet in the first place.
CantBuySkills ago
I was using that as an example of what would be lost if we banned photos of children all together. You assumed I meant in some kind of pornographic manner... I meant in any matter. The person is calling for no posting pictures of kids of ANY kind.
slimanus ago
No I assume pedophiles can turn any photo of a child into whatever they want.. I don't see voat as a place where photos of children need to be shared at all. I'm fine with losing photos of happy families off traditional wives if it means the pedophiles will not be jacking off to innocent children on voat.
CantBuySkills ago
We should probably take down any posts about guns too. Ya know, since they kill people.
slimanus ago
What does that have to do with preventing pedophiles from jacking off to photos of kids on voat?
If I wanted to look at photos of happy families I wouldn't think or need to come here. Why do we need to share photos that pedophiles will like on this website at all, and why do we need their photos of kids in bathing suits as a sign of our free speech? I was thinking if we had one rule of no photos of children then it would be up to the mods to enforce, no?
CantBuySkills ago
Your thinking is drastically wrong in my opinion. What if I was out with a niece and she caught a giant fish and the only picture I took was of her holding it. I now can't post it thanks to your new rules. Banning pictures of children is the dumbest attempt at a solution to this.
slimanus ago
In my opinion you're a shitty fucking uncle if you'd put your niece's face on an anonymous internet forum. But I see you're intentionally missing my point, hope you die pedo.