I know you didn't, and I didn't imply it. I only mentioned there is a line between the two things and that line is blurred for a few people, which could threaten the foundation of what Voat is supposed to be. I'm just pointing this out to lurkers.
You must of missed my point, my point was not "weeb trash who jerk it to lolis should be banned" but rather weeb trash who jerk it to lolis piss me off since they are more or less defending pedophilia.
view the rest of the comments →
Zoldam ago
Loli porn defenders piss me off.
shrink ago
Pissing you off is perfectly acceptable. Silencing or banning them is not.
There are some people in this thread that can't tell the difference.
Zoldam ago
I never called for silencing or banning them. I have the right to say they piss me off, and they the right to piss me off.
shrink ago
I know you didn't, and I didn't imply it. I only mentioned there is a line between the two things and that line is blurred for a few people, which could threaten the foundation of what Voat is supposed to be. I'm just pointing this out to lurkers.
StrangeThingsAfoot ago
"Racism defenders piss me off"
Exact same argument used to shut down free speech. You need to take the stuff you object to with the stuff you agree with.
CognitiveDissident5 ago
Degeneracy is not protected by free speech.
unlimitedrulebook ago
*except when it is
Zoldam ago
How exactly is racism equivalent to loli porn?
You must of missed my point, my point was not "weeb trash who jerk it to lolis should be banned" but rather weeb trash who jerk it to lolis piss me off since they are more or less defending pedophilia.