look to your right there are 10 rules there they have been for a while, and they have been brought up for discussion and then these have stayed. If we are to decide that a system sub has only voat rules then we have 30 /v/whatever subs and no need for the other 29 to exist since they can't have rules about what should or should not be submitted to them.
It doesn't matter. System sub = voat rules, not sub rules. This has always been the case since @She. There just hasn't been a retard stupid enough to push the issue until now. And since admin are generally hands-off, things were let be.
I can work with that, then start asking putt to remove the 29 redundant subs instead of changing mods on those subs. fi there are no rules of what goes where why have the categories at all?
False premise. It's simple: system sub = voat rules. Any other sub, run as mods see fit.
And there's no reason to collapse subs. That's punishing other users because some retard in a system sub can't follow the site rules set down by admin.
can't follow what site rule? do the voat rules say what can and can't be posted in what sub? because otherwise you are just asking for multiple locations of unorganized submissions instead of just one. you are the one that wants no rules unique to separate system subs, 1 rule set 30 subs that is you preaching that not me I'm all for separate rules for each of those subs.
do the voat rules say what can and can't be posted in what sub?
Yes, in system subs. How do you not understand that this is the core of the problem when it is literally over this post and every other post about this problem? Are you not reading them? Is this the only post about it you've read and this is new news to you?
Feel free to point me to these rule bcause the ones I'm assume you all are meaning are the user agreement set https://voat.co/help/useragreement
Rules
These guidelines are intended to keep people safe, protect kids, keep Voat running, and to encourage personal responsibility for what you do on Voat. You must:
Keep Everyone Safe:
You agree to not intentionally jeopardize the health and safety of others or yourself.
Keep Personal Information Off Voat:
You agree to not post anyone's sensitive personal information that relates to that person's real world or online identity.
Do Not Incite Harm:
You agree not to encourage harm against people.
Protect Kids:
You agree not to post any child pornography or sexually suggestive content involving minors.
Take Personal Responsibility:
As you use Voat, please remember that your speech may have consequences and could lead to criminal and civil liability.
Subverses may create their own rules and enforce them as they see fit, providing they do not violate the terms of this agreement. You agree that Voat is not responsible for the actions taken or not taken by moderators.
and right there it says subverses may create their own rules, so feel free to point me to the rules for system operated subs since no one else has linked to them just mentioned them as if we all have seen and memorized them.
I literally told you that the admins set forth that rule. It is literally on the other threads of this same topic. I asked you if you'd read them. You haven't said that you did so that means you haven't. Which means you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground on this topic.
In other news, you should probably stop right about now. You can piss and moan and whine and bitch all you want but it's not going to change the facts: "System sub = voat rules". Not "mod rules." Voat rules.
You're not going to make anyone change this. You're not going to change anyone's mind.
where have they linked to them? I have been reading a bunch of these and people keep referring to those rules and none are linking them. I have quoted exactly the rules I assume you are referencing feel free to correct me and link to the ones you are refereeing to. Obviously if the rules I linked are not the ones I have not read them because I have not seen them.
Go read PeaceSeeker's history to find it. I'm not going to go find you a link (doing your job for you).
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have far more important things to do today than to deal with arrogant dumbasses like you. (Hint: That's your cue to shut up)
How cute insults and nothing to back up your own words just a suggestion to dig through 25,000 comments from a user. I quoted rules and link them for anyone to see you quote rules it it is our job to go see if you are making shit up or there is a real source? Yep I'm the one in the wrong on that process.
4 month old account, no SCP, limited CCP, and nothing but mouth trying to influence policy he doesn't understand. Shill if I ever saw one. Keep going, I have downvoats to hand out to you like candy.
look just above that 4 months line to the bio it is a replacement account for @thrus “ New user profile as I seem to have misplaced my old password. Old account Thrus ” And yes I don't submit stuff big deal, I would love to see a breakdown of the users here by SCP and CCP might be interisting to see how many really are heavy submitters for those that read and comment only and just what an average SCP or CCP are.
view the rest of the comments →
totes_magotes ago
System sub = voat rules, nothing more.
Remove the mod. This is @She Version 2.0 and it needs to be stomped right. fucking. now.
Thrus2 ago
look to your right there are 10 rules there they have been for a while, and they have been brought up for discussion and then these have stayed. If we are to decide that a system sub has only voat rules then we have 30 /v/whatever subs and no need for the other 29 to exist since they can't have rules about what should or should not be submitted to them.
totes_magotes ago
It doesn't matter. System sub = voat rules, not sub rules. This has always been the case since @She. There just hasn't been a retard stupid enough to push the issue until now. And since admin are generally hands-off, things were let be.
Thrus2 ago
I can work with that, then start asking putt to remove the 29 redundant subs instead of changing mods on those subs. fi there are no rules of what goes where why have the categories at all?
totes_magotes ago
False premise. It's simple: system sub = voat rules. Any other sub, run as mods see fit.
And there's no reason to collapse subs. That's punishing other users because some retard in a system sub can't follow the site rules set down by admin.
Thrus2 ago
can't follow what site rule? do the voat rules say what can and can't be posted in what sub? because otherwise you are just asking for multiple locations of unorganized submissions instead of just one. you are the one that wants no rules unique to separate system subs, 1 rule set 30 subs that is you preaching that not me I'm all for separate rules for each of those subs.
totes_magotes ago
Yes, in system subs. How do you not understand that this is the core of the problem when it is literally over this post and every other post about this problem? Are you not reading them? Is this the only post about it you've read and this is new news to you?
Thrus2 ago
Feel free to point me to these rule bcause the ones I'm assume you all are meaning are the user agreement set https://voat.co/help/useragreement
and right there it says subverses may create their own rules, so feel free to point me to the rules for system operated subs since no one else has linked to them just mentioned them as if we all have seen and memorized them.
totes_magotes ago
I literally told you that the admins set forth that rule. It is literally on the other threads of this same topic. I asked you if you'd read them. You haven't said that you did so that means you haven't. Which means you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground on this topic.
In other news, you should probably stop right about now. You can piss and moan and whine and bitch all you want but it's not going to change the facts: "System sub = voat rules". Not "mod rules." Voat rules.
You're not going to make anyone change this. You're not going to change anyone's mind.
Thrus2 ago
where have they linked to them? I have been reading a bunch of these and people keep referring to those rules and none are linking them. I have quoted exactly the rules I assume you are referencing feel free to correct me and link to the ones you are refereeing to. Obviously if the rules I linked are not the ones I have not read them because I have not seen them.
totes_magotes ago
Wow, you really are retarded.
"I've tried nothing and I'm all out of ideas."
Go read PeaceSeeker's history to find it. I'm not going to go find you a link (doing your job for you).
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have far more important things to do today than to deal with arrogant dumbasses like you. (Hint: That's your cue to shut up)
Thrus2 ago
How cute insults and nothing to back up your own words just a suggestion to dig through 25,000 comments from a user. I quoted rules and link them for anyone to see you quote rules it it is our job to go see if you are making shit up or there is a real source? Yep I'm the one in the wrong on that process.
totes_magotes ago
4 month old account, no SCP, limited CCP, and nothing but mouth trying to influence policy he doesn't understand. Shill if I ever saw one. Keep going, I have downvoats to hand out to you like candy.
Thrus2 ago
look just above that 4 months line to the bio it is a replacement account for @thrus “ New user profile as I seem to have misplaced my old password. Old account Thrus ” And yes I don't submit stuff big deal, I would love to see a breakdown of the users here by SCP and CCP might be interisting to see how many really are heavy submitters for those that read and comment only and just what an average SCP or CCP are.