Even if that was the case it calls into question why the thousands of videos attacking Christianity havent been taken down at all. Seems it only applies when its criticism of Muslims or Jews. Really makes you think 🤔
She is really well spoken. I wish I was half as good as she is when I was 14! I suspected this would happen. The hard push for diversity, race mixing, no borders, and no nationalism is going to result in a hard push back. I can't wait for Gen Z to get in full swing.
I watched some of her earlier videos where she's a lot less well spoken, has choppy as fuck edits, etc. and you can see that she's been using her own words for years. She holds herself to a higher standard than most so I have no doubts she's not a complete degenerate and if anything probably scares the staceys and soy boys away from her at school making it easy to not act like them. She's definitely going to grow up to be a ball busting adult and land herself a quality man for it though so I hope she keeps being herself and lives a happy life.
I remember seeing her as Lt. Corbis a few years back. She was basically a 'commentary' channel that talked/made fun of stars of that app Music.ly, etc. Another "LeafyIsHere" types. In one of her recent videos she says she found it funny how an 11 year old (at the time) was able to do it so well and that it spoke a lot about the genre. She talks about it in the first minute of this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptZALLKJSjc
I'd just say she's a child who got big for being a kid that made fun of stuff and cussed, helped that she was female. Not much more to say about her (since I know very little about her) but I guess she got redpilled heavily.
Reading a script. The videos where she is live she fumbles around as much as one would expect from an 11 year old claiming to be 14 so the channel doesn't get shut down.
the "but she's reading from a script!" shit is really annoying, like of fucking course youtube videos are scripted, nobody wants to listen to someone rambling on for 15 minutes and tripping over their words. Of course they'd plan out what they're going to say before hand.
Somehow some people think that being 'scripted' somehow means it's malicious or fake.
Literally everyone who makes commentary videos reads a script. Writing a masterful script or writing out convincing arguements and backing them up with evidence is a much different skill than debating in real time. I don't expect them to be masters at debating. She's clearly not 11, if you think that you haven't seen a 11 or 14 year old in a while. The only problem would be if she doesn't believe anything she is told to say, but I also think that's clearly not the case as evidence of her live streams and Twitter feed, etc.
Posted automatically (#48710) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@CameraCode0: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)
She said she collaborates with one other person to write the script. I don't see any evidence that's she's lying and that she doesn't actually contribute to it in any way. Again, the only problem is if she doesn't believe anything she says, which is likely not the case due to the reasons I stated. Is it wrong to have someone help you write a script for a video, especially when you are 14?
Tried to watch, but the video in the link wont play. I subscribed to her youtube channel earlier today while I was at work, but never had a chance to watch. Anyone else have other sources?
"You bring up a very interesting point. Alternative social media stars constantly rail against the corruption and bias of their respective platforms, but they are always at their mercy. There is constant calls for government intervention (something I oppose and I think will only make things worse) or these stars being forced to get donations via non-conventional ways.
I think the proper response is this: If all the disaffected Youtube stars and wrongthink Twitter users banded together collectively deleted their channels, and moved them to their free speech counterparts (Gab, Bitchute, and the like) it would have a devastating effect on the mainstream outlets.
Their subscribers would be forced to the free speech alternatives if they wanted such content. This would increase traffic to free speech sites and force them to be recognized as legitimate competitors in the social media marketplace. With Youtube and Twitter no longer being able to control public discourse, their power will be utterly broken.
TL;DR CONTENT CREATORS SHOULD UNIONIZE, DELETE THEIR CHANNELS AND MOVE TO FREE SPEECH ALTERNATIVES. THIS WOULD BREAK THE BACK OF SILICON VALLEY CONTROL OVER THEIR CONTENT WHILE AT SAME TIME AVOIDING ANY GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION."
Bro is dead on its time to do something about this shit. I'll try to edit an @ post for him.
He's right, but the reason it won't happen is because these people only care about their bank accounts, and big tech gives them a bigger audience to get people to donate to them. On top of that, all they do is virtue-signal and tell you want you want to hear, instead of using their huge reach to organize protests / rallies to advance the right-wing cause. The only guy I ever saw doing anything was Ali Alexander. I'm not a fan of him, but I respect that he's actually out there on the streets doing something rather than just crying on Twitter and saying we need bigger government.
Only problem is that these "free speech" alternatives will bow to the almighty shekel once they get big enough to be attractive to (((investors))). Look at early Reddit vs. now for an example, once that advertiser money started to come in ideals and principles went out the window quick. That's why the political right is always on the run online, servers are expensive and not a lot of people donate. I don't really know the solution to it, seems to me like free speech is a function of size since more traffic=more bandwidth and sites have to at least break even to stay up, greed aside. The internet is not as free and open as it seems, at least when it comes to creating and registering a domain.
I understand but what I'm getting at here is that once the content creators unionize for lack of a better term, platforms will have to treat them with more respect and won't be able to arbitrarily ban them to please Jews. If they do, then all the content and thus money making creators will just move to another platform.
I'm 75/25 on the idea of government intervention/regulation of social media.
First of all, mostly as an aside, almost all countries except the US have forced government intervention on social media, and arrests made based on social media posts.
But I'd say that if social media claims to be a service they should not be allowed to censor free speech any more than the government should be able to. They are not publishing houses. Putt does not look through every Voat comment and decide what should and should not be posted. They are autonomous services, who increasingly are hiding behind this shield of removing what they claim is "false or misleading information" (inevitably they decide what is false/misleading) or "hate speech". It's no longer their platform, though. It's the platform of all users who create content. Without content creators, YouTube would be nothing.
I would say there are exactly 3 categories of stuff which should be removed, and these categories should be applied as narrowly (in the legal sense) as possible:
Phishing sites. Fake login pages for actual websites.
Spam. Actually trying to sell something. Political speech is not spam. Repetitive content is not spam.
I would argue that (2) and (3) are actually very minor problems, and sites can and do exist that allow anonymous posts of all content, that aren't flooded by spam. A legal requirement for social media would be similar to net neutrality. Websites which desire to do business in the US which allow automated posting of user content may not remove that content except under the circumstances defined above. That does not apply in the case of active moderation. If you have a human review the comments for your site and approve each one instead of posting-then-deleting, the law no longer applies. For example, sites that cater to children may wish to use that.
I think it's more like our rights as a consumer. I also don't favor regulations but the abuse of power has grown to large. I'd almost assume not just intelligence communitys but governments are at the wheel of this sensorship. This is an attempt to polish up a control system for the 2020 elections.
We need something more like a digital constitution. An ammendment for speach online and privacy.
Fuck all our cell phone companies are tracking us and selling the data. That was all paid for by our own government.
Yeah, that's the problem. I'd like for the free market to govern itself, but once a firm has a monopoly, there's no longer a free market. In the case of social media, there are some that are almost monopolies (ie while there are other video sharing sites tahn YouTube, if you want to make money from sharing videos, YouTube is essentially the only option you have), or oligarchies with the same investors/power players.
If there were many viable options with many users and different opinions of the staff/moderators on each one, then I'd say "hands off, let the platforms decide for themselves". It's just not the case. They can't claim to be neutral parties (under DMCA, etc) on one hand, and curators on the other.
Would you be willing to help me out with this? The first time I used BitChute, I instantly realized it had magnet links but when I went to try it out, my download never started.
I'm not torrent retarded, but I haven't tried any videos since then. Do you think it was simply the video? Who is the original seed, the uploader? Do I need to do anything specific to BitChute before downloading and seeding videos? Appreciate any comments, and I understand if you don't want to help out this tl;dr.
The magnet link should launch your torrent client and it'll handle it from there. First it has to check the DDT cloud to get the actual torrent file from the magnet link, then it can start the torrent and that will tell you how many seeds or peers there are.
For example: magnet:?xt=urn:btih:3e5aaa321c0a6d8f7f92a6b076d211a64ba84f0e&dn=CimmdXZA3uCj.mp4&tr=udp://explodie.org:6969&tr=udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969&tr=udp://tracker.empire-js.us:1337&tr=udp://tracker.leechers-paradise.org:6969&tr=udp://tracker.opentrackr.org:1337&tr=wss://tracker.openwebtorrent.com&as=https://seed26.bitchute.com/JWa8508PdoWK/CimmdXZA3uCj.mp4&as=https://seed20.bitchute.com/JWa8508PdoWK/CimmdXZA3uCj.mp4&xs=https://www.bitchute.com/torrent/JWa8508PdoWK/CimmdXZA3uCj.webtorrent
You can simply shorten this. Much of that url is hints to your bittorrent client, but it can probably figure it out just fine without the hints and you can chop off everything after the & like so: magnet:?xt=urn:btih:3e5aaa321c0a6d8f7f92a6b076d211a64ba84f0e
If your bittorent client doesn't autolaunch when you click a link, or if the links aren't clickable (like in this post), there should be a place to paste the link, which varies from bittorrent client to bittorrent client.
lol ur dum cuz u say thing that is also proven by the thing I posted
Fun fact: You have no goddamn idea what symbology is. Do not reply again on this topic until you have the most basic understanding thereof. It's Gabbai. It's gabbai because it's STILL THE FUCKING LETTERS FROM THE FUCKING WORD, YOU INCOMPREHENSIBLY STUPID LUNATIC. It doesn't matter in the slightest how it was DERIVED, because the result is the same.
Patrick little doxxed some people and was subsequently banned. Then was given a second chance... but he screwed up again by making a post which caused GoDaddy to boot Gab off their servers, so he was banned.... again.
well all I know is that they banned two of my favorite people on the alt right, namely Little and Cantwell. And many more that I used to hear from a lot.
Classic Alinsky tactic from the left to attack something they don't like to keep people away. Even if Gab isn't really entirely free as it should be, it's a huge step up from Twitter and Facebook.
I've been on Gab since they opened shop and I can guarantee you there is just as much anti-Jew sentiment there than here on Voat... and no one has ever been banned for naming the Jew there.
Explain how ✡Gab.ai✡ is in a position to determine whether a person is or is not "the subject of a public controversy", and thereafter banning anyone who has any problem therewith.
Well technically if it was a honeypot they won't try to silence anti jew posts, if anything they would encourage it. Although naming the jew isn't illegal ... yet ... so I'm not sure why someone would setup a honeypot.
Yeah, I've had the same experience. Actually, I stopped frequenting there because my feed was pure antijew.... And I get tired of seeing kikes. I should say, I think all social media is retarded.. anything that requires some personal info and a picture of myself is just stupid to me
I have the skills to easily make a video sharing site, but the bandwidth costs are so high that there's no way I could afford it. Even if it were possible to do something like charge $20 a month to host videos and have a premium viewer membership for something like $5, it wouldn't work. YouTube keeps their monopoly by making things free.
And then you have chicken and egg problem. Your charge out of the gate to host videos, people go somewhere free. Even if they stay and you offer them free speech for $20 a month, all the users are on other sites. So they are paying for videos to be hosted so a few people can watch them.
The alternative is you make it free until it gets big, then charge. And then people are mad your free service now costs money.
YouTube will maintain their monopoly on video hosting as long as they keep video hosting as a business where you lose money. It's some seriously fucked up monopolistic behavior, run a service at a loss so no competitors can show up.
Video hosting blows, from a business perspective. The bandwidth to ad views ratio is absolutely horrible for videos. A video can be 500+MB of bandwidth, and you can show maybe 3 or 4 ads in that duration to make money, as the hosting provider. If you are doing a web page, even a bloating piece of shit web page, that's 5MB per page and 3 or 4 ads. You show 100 times more ads for the same bandwidth when you are showing web pages instead of videos.
You get 1000 views on a 500MB video, that's almost 500GB of bandwidth used to show about 3000 ads. That's horrendous. If you were serving web pages with that same amount of bandwidth, that'd be like 300,000 ad impressions. (please double check my math I'm in a hurry to leave and drinking my coffee).
So how is Google making money? Certainly most people have figured out ad blockers by now, right? Where else do they get income aside from selling user data? Serious question.
YouTube has never made money and it just leeches off of Google's profitable ventures. Last I read, Google's only really profitable business is advertising, which they use to fund other ventures like YouTube, etc. Android, for example, is just one product designed to gather user information about people and show them ads. And blocking ads on Android is significantly more complicated than in a desktop. And there's a lot of people using Android out there.
Here is a good source, basically, Google is an advertising company. Their means of collecting information is primarily (from a business perspective, ignoring three letter agencies) meant to help them show more relevant ads. And if you have a set advertising budget, you will go to Google because Google will show your ad to the best matching people. That is all Google does to make money.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/030416/googles-6-most-profitable-lines-business-googl.asp
In fact, the article states exactly what I said, and I said that before even finding the link .My guess is that YouTube is clamping down on content because they want to be like reddit, where people pay them to promote their videos while not making it obvious it's an ad. Basically, types of services where someone makes a video and they want it exposed to many people, so YouTube theoretically gets paid to push specific videos for clients. I don't have any proof this is happening, though I have seen clearly unrelated videos show up in YouTube feeds on several accounts, ones not even owned by me. I suspect YouTube is tightening their rules so the people who (probably) are buying these promoted video spots in search do not have their videos show up next to things they don't want to be associated with.
Whenever someone tries using a current payment processor, they feeeze transactions. Then they try making their own payment processor, sowmthing other then cryptocurrencies, and they fail because the govt and creditcard co. Go after them.
Im not saying all this as an excuse to gove up.
Just stating why its taking awhile.
Anything we could build on ETH would be cool. Perhaps with a browser plug in you toggle on and off. I know there are a few getting started but they have the ability to pull down dontent.
I host all my sites in Pakistan (in business for over 10 years) actually. I've had zero down time and its cheap as fuck. I tried a few resellers that were using AWS and it was constantly fucked up.
My main business focuses on the Asian Market. It depends on what your doing. It loads and I have compression on everything. It's was like $87 for 3 years. I went with them because very few providers issue free ssl for my sites.
Yeah, it baffles me that Amazon is in any wise viewed as a quality service. They get hacked constantly, they're inflexible, they're expensive and they crash all the time. How can anyone see them as quality? Their reputation baffles me.
AWS comes off as expensive. I used to think the only reason to use the aws cloud is to keep the costs of ramping up low and meet the demands of doing so quickly as you don't have to deal with hardware issues.
However there are so many providers out there that anything can be turned into a 'cloud' with a few lines of code and sftp.
Yeah and by the fucking way I want the word woke back. It use to mean you took so many red pills you were a lazer autistic. When did those cunts get there hands on it.
She mentioned it a couple of times in some of her live streams, but still didn't blame ALL jews. I think she'll get there eventually.
Also, in her meinkraft streams you might catch her destroying the flag of israel every now and then. In her latest one the flag had a modified version where it was a rainbow flag with the star of david, so that was amusing to see.
yeah she a sweet kid, she just throws her opinion out from what she reads which is totally fine. But in reality, it shows you the extent that youtube will go to silence dissent. a 14 year young girl who live streams minecraft? for fucks sake.
but still didn't blame ALL jews
i dont blame all jews either, i blame the family of jews that try to control. a person cannot be held responsible how they are born.
the flag had a modified version where it was a rainbow flag with the star of david, so that was amusing to see.
Don't listen to her, goyim! She'll fill your cattle heads with lies! Here, have some nice Late Night Jimmy Kimmel content, that's what you want. Sleeeeeeep, sleeeeep goyim.
she's actually a Sephradi Jew, the whole palistian talk... is simply to get the goyim associate Palestinians with Socialism
https://files.catbox.moe/ula68c.png
I've watched a couple. That girl is WAY TOO articulate for a 28 year old. No way is she doing that herself. On the Chan they noticed she outed herself on a podcast. Couldn't answer some questions. I didn't hear it, Im just going off what i've heard.
she is tho, like.. i thought too that she was being coached. but really isnt. Watching a couple of her streams, she is that articulate.28 year old? huh.... shes like 14
2: its way different than making a video with a script and rehearsed than live impromptu. she probaby just brain farted out of being nervous.
look, im sitting here defending her as some that worships her. I just saying I felt the same way as you did. And, I found out I was wrong. watching a couple of her streams its obvious she has a head on her shoulders and is I would say a sweet kid.
she is that articulate.28 year old? huh.... shes like 14
That's my point. I realize she is way younger. Most Millennials aren't as articulate as her. When I say most, I know two or three that have Masters degrees that can talk at that level.
Whoever, whatever. The language has "Them" Scared. Scared as fuck. They want to close that down and not let anything out as it might change one mind.
a lot of little kids are like this tho, they dont watch MSM. she just happens to be a youtuber. and she is not a millenial, she would be what you would call gen-z
i dont know, im just going to drop it. Its basically a cute kid that has interest in current politics
I'll shoot you a pm when shes able to live stream again, i really dont watch them. but it just pops in my feed... and quite honestly its a first amendment issue
Butts have lots of functions. But you should eat your vegetables so you can poop good. It comes out rock hard and clean. How often do you have to wipe your ass? I guarantee it’s too often. Trust me. Also when an older woman ties you up and fucks you with a strap on. She calls you a faggot tells you to moan and slaps you across the face and on the ass. She pretends to be your mother. Also you can stick drugs up your butt it’s like banging(needles) as far as it jumps it straight into your blood stream. I almost did it once with amphetamines but I just....i just couldn’t do it. It’s weird. Maybe with coke one day. Iv figures out once your nose gets clogged and fucked up you just take some toss it in some water it liquifies then you can rail it like that which granted isn’t as fun but it keeps your high a-rollin.
I don’t like shit or piss you weirdo. What you never kissed a girl before. Same shit. You’re just being lame. Why can’t I be into what I’m into
She’s bent over you spitting in your mouth. God damnit. She used to be my dentist you believe that. All those years I was underage laid out on the table. She’s bent over me her tits dangling in my face and I’m getting hard but how am I supposed to cover that up. I wonder if she saw it and loved it. 15 16 17 year old me turned up and numbed up. Was one fun New Year’s Eve.
Rabid_Robot ago
I like her a lot.
Plant_Boy ago
So let me get this straight, YouTube is saying that a 14 year old girl is bullying and harassing a 1500 year old patriarchal religion?
bubby963 ago
Even if that was the case it calls into question why the thousands of videos attacking Christianity havent been taken down at all. Seems it only applies when its criticism of Muslims or Jews. Really makes you think 🤔
fge7983 ago
She is really well spoken. I wish I was half as good as she is when I was 14! I suspected this would happen. The hard push for diversity, race mixing, no borders, and no nationalism is going to result in a hard push back. I can't wait for Gen Z to get in full swing.
thebearfromstartrack ago
NEVER talk to ME like a nigger life is better.
TheKalergiFan ago
Glad it got underlined or else I would have missed it.
bourbonexpert ago
Niggers
Hispeedtim2876 ago
Full 18 min video that yt banned. Thanks soph
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tfqXi80V9ICH/
theHubrisOfMan ago
In a time where we need strong men, can we just give this little girl a pat on the head and a sub and NOT make her into an idol.
Hispeedtim2876 ago
Here is the guy explaining about the douche bag going after soph
https://youtu.be/H0UGEtnGwUM
prairie ago
A person shouldn't have to age this quickly.
SkrutinizeYou ago
Omg some homo in the comments said "we support you. R/the_donald has sent its army."
Hahahaha
Whiteflourguy ago
Way to go Jew Tube, Way to shit on our free speech
Rothbard_Block_Hoppe ago
sort of like Brennan
nothingoriginal ago
If she's really coming up with this stuff herself and still a virgin, some guy is going to be lucky to have her.
475677 ago
I watched some of her earlier videos where she's a lot less well spoken, has choppy as fuck edits, etc. and you can see that she's been using her own words for years. She holds herself to a higher standard than most so I have no doubts she's not a complete degenerate and if anything probably scares the staceys and soy boys away from her at school making it easy to not act like them. She's definitely going to grow up to be a ball busting adult and land herself a quality man for it though so I hope she keeps being herself and lives a happy life.
AinzOown ago
Who is she?
BO2 ago
I remember seeing her as Lt. Corbis a few years back. She was basically a 'commentary' channel that talked/made fun of stars of that app Music.ly, etc. Another "LeafyIsHere" types. In one of her recent videos she says she found it funny how an 11 year old (at the time) was able to do it so well and that it spoke a lot about the genre. She talks about it in the first minute of this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptZALLKJSjc
I'd just say she's a child who got big for being a kid that made fun of stuff and cussed, helped that she was female. Not much more to say about her (since I know very little about her) but I guess she got redpilled heavily.
Rothbard_Block_Hoppe ago
https://twitter.com/Bernstein/status/1128373652037222401
https://www.bitchute.com/video/OdaUDeAGIck/
tanukihat ago
How does one kid get so based in just 14 years?
Mittermeyer ago
Reading a script. The videos where she is live she fumbles around as much as one would expect from an 11 year old claiming to be 14 so the channel doesn't get shut down.
Laurentius_the_pyro ago
the "but she's reading from a script!" shit is really annoying, like of fucking course youtube videos are scripted, nobody wants to listen to someone rambling on for 15 minutes and tripping over their words. Of course they'd plan out what they're going to say before hand.
Somehow some people think that being 'scripted' somehow means it's malicious or fake.
CameraCode0 ago
Literally everyone who makes commentary videos reads a script. Writing a masterful script or writing out convincing arguements and backing them up with evidence is a much different skill than debating in real time. I don't expect them to be masters at debating. She's clearly not 11, if you think that you haven't seen a 11 or 14 year old in a while. The only problem would be if she doesn't believe anything she is told to say, but I also think that's clearly not the case as evidence of her live streams and Twitter feed, etc.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this anonymous v/BEATLESTROLLARMY comment.
Posted automatically (#48710) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@CameraCode0: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)
Mittermeyer ago
Is something her team does as she has said so herself.
CameraCode0 ago
She said she collaborates with one other person to write the script. I don't see any evidence that's she's lying and that she doesn't actually contribute to it in any way. Again, the only problem is if she doesn't believe anything she says, which is likely not the case due to the reasons I stated. Is it wrong to have someone help you write a script for a video, especially when you are 14?
zasrrt ago
Agreed, but she recently live-interviewed some guy and did a pretty good job, so a lot of this is really her I suspect.
Zestyclose_Marketing ago
Well at least her older sibling is redpilling her
Flint138 ago
Soph is //ourgirl//
Myan ago
@bitchute needs live streaming
StrangeThingsAfoot ago
There are some interesting P2P-based streaming services, mostly for live sports, ie TVAnts.
hikedelics ago
Tried to watch, but the video in the link wont play. I subscribed to her youtube channel earlier today while I was at work, but never had a chance to watch. Anyone else have other sources?
Rothbard_Block_Hoppe ago
agreed
Neongreen ago
I'm just going to copy and past this other dude.
"You bring up a very interesting point. Alternative social media stars constantly rail against the corruption and bias of their respective platforms, but they are always at their mercy. There is constant calls for government intervention (something I oppose and I think will only make things worse) or these stars being forced to get donations via non-conventional ways.
I think the proper response is this: If all the disaffected Youtube stars and wrongthink Twitter users banded together collectively deleted their channels, and moved them to their free speech counterparts (Gab, Bitchute, and the like) it would have a devastating effect on the mainstream outlets.
Their subscribers would be forced to the free speech alternatives if they wanted such content. This would increase traffic to free speech sites and force them to be recognized as legitimate competitors in the social media marketplace. With Youtube and Twitter no longer being able to control public discourse, their power will be utterly broken.
TL;DR CONTENT CREATORS SHOULD UNIONIZE, DELETE THEIR CHANNELS AND MOVE TO FREE SPEECH ALTERNATIVES. THIS WOULD BREAK THE BACK OF SILICON VALLEY CONTROL OVER THEIR CONTENT WHILE AT SAME TIME AVOIDING ANY GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION."
Bro is dead on its time to do something about this shit. I'll try to edit an @ post for him.
spaceman84 ago
Doesn't work because normies don't venture off mainstream sites and default apps.
user9713 ago
He's right, but the reason it won't happen is because these people only care about their bank accounts, and big tech gives them a bigger audience to get people to donate to them. On top of that, all they do is virtue-signal and tell you want you want to hear, instead of using their huge reach to organize protests / rallies to advance the right-wing cause. The only guy I ever saw doing anything was Ali Alexander. I'm not a fan of him, but I respect that he's actually out there on the streets doing something rather than just crying on Twitter and saying we need bigger government.
nevertriggered ago
Only problem is that these "free speech" alternatives will bow to the almighty shekel once they get big enough to be attractive to (((investors))). Look at early Reddit vs. now for an example, once that advertiser money started to come in ideals and principles went out the window quick. That's why the political right is always on the run online, servers are expensive and not a lot of people donate. I don't really know the solution to it, seems to me like free speech is a function of size since more traffic=more bandwidth and sites have to at least break even to stay up, greed aside. The internet is not as free and open as it seems, at least when it comes to creating and registering a domain.
IndigoElectric ago
I understand but what I'm getting at here is that once the content creators unionize for lack of a better term, platforms will have to treat them with more respect and won't be able to arbitrarily ban them to please Jews. If they do, then all the content and thus money making creators will just move to another platform.
StrangeThingsAfoot ago
I'm 75/25 on the idea of government intervention/regulation of social media.
First of all, mostly as an aside, almost all countries except the US have forced government intervention on social media, and arrests made based on social media posts.
But I'd say that if social media claims to be a service they should not be allowed to censor free speech any more than the government should be able to. They are not publishing houses. Putt does not look through every Voat comment and decide what should and should not be posted. They are autonomous services, who increasingly are hiding behind this shield of removing what they claim is "false or misleading information" (inevitably they decide what is false/misleading) or "hate speech". It's no longer their platform, though. It's the platform of all users who create content. Without content creators, YouTube would be nothing.
I would say there are exactly 3 categories of stuff which should be removed, and these categories should be applied as narrowly (in the legal sense) as possible:
I would argue that (2) and (3) are actually very minor problems, and sites can and do exist that allow anonymous posts of all content, that aren't flooded by spam. A legal requirement for social media would be similar to net neutrality. Websites which desire to do business in the US which allow automated posting of user content may not remove that content except under the circumstances defined above. That does not apply in the case of active moderation. If you have a human review the comments for your site and approve each one instead of posting-then-deleting, the law no longer applies. For example, sites that cater to children may wish to use that.
Neongreen ago
I think it's more like our rights as a consumer. I also don't favor regulations but the abuse of power has grown to large. I'd almost assume not just intelligence communitys but governments are at the wheel of this sensorship. This is an attempt to polish up a control system for the 2020 elections.
We need something more like a digital constitution. An ammendment for speach online and privacy.
Fuck all our cell phone companies are tracking us and selling the data. That was all paid for by our own government.
StrangeThingsAfoot ago
Yeah, that's the problem. I'd like for the free market to govern itself, but once a firm has a monopoly, there's no longer a free market. In the case of social media, there are some that are almost monopolies (ie while there are other video sharing sites tahn YouTube, if you want to make money from sharing videos, YouTube is essentially the only option you have), or oligarchies with the same investors/power players.
If there were many viable options with many users and different opinions of the staff/moderators on each one, then I'd say "hands off, let the platforms decide for themselves". It's just not the case. They can't claim to be neutral parties (under DMCA, etc) on one hand, and curators on the other.
NiggerVirus ago
Start posting this to every single persons YouTube channel that you think it applies to
IndigoElectric ago
@Neongreen
Thanks man I really appreciate this
Rothbard_Block_Hoppe ago
the thing is, Gab is a kike honeypot, and Bitchute is taking down the NZ shooter videos. But i think Bitchute is definitely very good.
negrojohnny ago
why is bitchute taking down?
Not_Important ago
I think they still want to operate in NZ
Base311 ago
Disappointed to hear that about bitchute. Is there any other video platforms that dont remove NZ shooting?
My_Name_is_Not_Sure ago
Rabbi.
Base311 ago
Never heard of that platform. Sounds kiked to me.
fellowwhiteperson ago
Bittorrent. Every Bitchute video contains a torrent file that stays live much longer than the bitchute url.
sometaters ago
Would you be willing to help me out with this? The first time I used BitChute, I instantly realized it had magnet links but when I went to try it out, my download never started. I'm not torrent retarded, but I haven't tried any videos since then. Do you think it was simply the video? Who is the original seed, the uploader? Do I need to do anything specific to BitChute before downloading and seeding videos? Appreciate any comments, and I understand if you don't want to help out this tl;dr.
fellowwhiteperson ago
The magnet link should launch your torrent client and it'll handle it from there. First it has to check the DDT cloud to get the actual torrent file from the magnet link, then it can start the torrent and that will tell you how many seeds or peers there are.
For example: magnet:?xt=urn:btih:3e5aaa321c0a6d8f7f92a6b076d211a64ba84f0e&dn=CimmdXZA3uCj.mp4&tr=udp://explodie.org:6969&tr=udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969&tr=udp://tracker.empire-js.us:1337&tr=udp://tracker.leechers-paradise.org:6969&tr=udp://tracker.opentrackr.org:1337&tr=wss://tracker.openwebtorrent.com&as=https://seed26.bitchute.com/JWa8508PdoWK/CimmdXZA3uCj.mp4&as=https://seed20.bitchute.com/JWa8508PdoWK/CimmdXZA3uCj.mp4&xs=https://www.bitchute.com/torrent/JWa8508PdoWK/CimmdXZA3uCj.webtorrent
You can simply shorten this. Much of that url is hints to your bittorrent client, but it can probably figure it out just fine without the hints and you can chop off everything after the & like so: magnet:?xt=urn:btih:3e5aaa321c0a6d8f7f92a6b076d211a64ba84f0e
If your bittorent client doesn't autolaunch when you click a link, or if the links aren't clickable (like in this post), there should be a place to paste the link, which varies from bittorrent client to bittorrent client.
sometaters ago
I meant more that the torrent client worked normally, but it never downloaded any number of bytes.
Base311 ago
Thanks for the info.
ratsmack ago
Don't start the Gab kike bull shit... I've shown numerous times it is completely false.
Tallest_Skil ago
ratsmack ago
People like you are so retarded, it's amazing you can muster enough intelligence to take your next breath... Try reading.
Tallest_Skil ago
Fun fact: You have no goddamn idea what symbology is. Do not reply again on this topic until you have the most basic understanding thereof. It's Gabbai. It's gabbai because it's STILL THE FUCKING LETTERS FROM THE FUCKING WORD, YOU INCOMPREHENSIBLY STUPID LUNATIC. It doesn't matter in the slightest how it was DERIVED, because the result is the same.
ratsmack ago
Actually it's gab.ai <=== only one 'b' in that.
Tallest_Skil ago
Magical, shlomo. Did you figure that out all on your own? Jews have never hidden behind spelling differences using pilpul. Hasn't happened.
Rothbard_Block_Hoppe ago
gab banned Cantwell, Patrick Little, and many more actual alt right people.
ratsmack ago
Patrick little doxxed some people and was subsequently banned. Then was given a second chance... but he screwed up again by making a post which caused GoDaddy to boot Gab off their servers, so he was banned.... again.
Paul Nehlen doxxed Ricky Vaughn, so he was banned.
Cantwell was banned and admits he screwed up... read his blog post.
All bans are justified according to Gab rules.
Your "many more" comment is bullshit.
Rothbard_Block_Hoppe ago
we need something like mastodon, gab still censors
ratsmack ago
Show me proof that Gab censors anything.
Rothbard_Block_Hoppe ago
well all I know is that they banned two of my favorite people on the alt right, namely Little and Cantwell. And many more that I used to hear from a lot.
ratsmack ago
They were banned for breaking the rules. Unfortunately you're not literate enough to read, so it's best that retards like you don't frequent Gab.
Rothbard_Block_Hoppe ago
dude I use gab all the time you nigger
ratsmack ago
Well eat my crusty shorts then, faggot.
Rothbard_Block_Hoppe ago
no
U
Simonsaysgoat ago
Got a link to your proof? They kicked pat little
ratsmack ago
https://voat.co/v/politics/3065729/17062935
Neongreen ago
Is it? I am happy if that is the case. Do you have you sources for that? Hack the planet!
aaronC ago
Classic Alinsky tactic from the left to attack something they don't like to keep people away. Even if Gab isn't really entirely free as it should be, it's a huge step up from Twitter and Facebook.
Corpse_washer ago
Hes been shilling for gab for a time now.
ratsmack ago
I've been on Gab since they opened shop and I can guarantee you there is just as much anti-Jew sentiment there than here on Voat... and no one has ever been banned for naming the Jew there.
cuzimloony ago
"Gab has never banned anyone for naming the jew." Must not know about this guy..... https://www.mic.com/articles/192595/gab-just-booted-white-supremacist-patrick-little-for-anti-semitic-threats
ratsmack ago
Here: https://voat.co/v/politics/3065729/17062935
cuzimloony ago
Yeah. Banned for hate speech. Same as (((facebook)))
ratsmack ago
Banned for doxxing... completely different.
Tallest_Skil ago
Explain how ✡Gab.ai✡ is in a position to determine whether a person is or is not "the subject of a public controversy", and thereafter banning anyone who has any problem therewith.
I will wait for you not to reply.
Smallest_Skil ago
Gab is awesome. How can anyone not like a free speech platform?
cuzimloony ago
(((Excuses)))
subscribetopewdiepie ago
Well technically if it was a honeypot they won't try to silence anti jew posts, if anything they would encourage it. Although naming the jew isn't illegal ... yet ... so I'm not sure why someone would setup a honeypot.
smokratez ago
It's to make you go fuck the niggers, muslims and jews in public and get you fired and/or ousted from your friends and family.
Goys-R-Us ago
Jokes on them, have no friends, close to retirement and don't give a fuck what my family thinks.
Adminstrater ago
Reddit wasn't a honeypot until it became one. So everything is eventually compromised.
If you spread out butter on enough bread, eventually you'll run out of butter.
Trousersnake1488 ago
Yeah, I've had the same experience. Actually, I stopped frequenting there because my feed was pure antijew.... And I get tired of seeing kikes. I should say, I think all social media is retarded.. anything that requires some personal info and a picture of myself is just stupid to me
MrDarkWater ago
Just so long as it stays off Facebook
ratsmack ago
So long as what stays off Faceberg?.... naming the Jew?
MrDarkWater ago
Stay contained on gabai
ratsmack ago
You must be an oven dodger I guess.
ratsmack ago
Here is some of the previous discussion: https://voat.co/v/whatever/3154198/17982948
GreenSlug ago
The alternative sites need to step up their game as well.
Neongreen ago
Then we need to help pay for it. That shit isn't free. We also need to make sure they don't run on AWS as it's a singular fail point.
aaronC ago
I have the skills to easily make a video sharing site, but the bandwidth costs are so high that there's no way I could afford it. Even if it were possible to do something like charge $20 a month to host videos and have a premium viewer membership for something like $5, it wouldn't work. YouTube keeps their monopoly by making things free.
And then you have chicken and egg problem. Your charge out of the gate to host videos, people go somewhere free. Even if they stay and you offer them free speech for $20 a month, all the users are on other sites. So they are paying for videos to be hosted so a few people can watch them.
The alternative is you make it free until it gets big, then charge. And then people are mad your free service now costs money.
YouTube will maintain their monopoly on video hosting as long as they keep video hosting as a business where you lose money. It's some seriously fucked up monopolistic behavior, run a service at a loss so no competitors can show up.
Video hosting blows, from a business perspective. The bandwidth to ad views ratio is absolutely horrible for videos. A video can be 500+MB of bandwidth, and you can show maybe 3 or 4 ads in that duration to make money, as the hosting provider. If you are doing a web page, even a bloating piece of shit web page, that's 5MB per page and 3 or 4 ads. You show 100 times more ads for the same bandwidth when you are showing web pages instead of videos.
You get 1000 views on a 500MB video, that's almost 500GB of bandwidth used to show about 3000 ads. That's horrendous. If you were serving web pages with that same amount of bandwidth, that'd be like 300,000 ad impressions. (please double check my math I'm in a hurry to leave and drinking my coffee).
Goys-R-Us ago
So how is Google making money? Certainly most people have figured out ad blockers by now, right? Where else do they get income aside from selling user data? Serious question.
aaronC ago
YouTube has never made money and it just leeches off of Google's profitable ventures. Last I read, Google's only really profitable business is advertising, which they use to fund other ventures like YouTube, etc. Android, for example, is just one product designed to gather user information about people and show them ads. And blocking ads on Android is significantly more complicated than in a desktop. And there's a lot of people using Android out there.
Here is a good source, basically, Google is an advertising company. Their means of collecting information is primarily (from a business perspective, ignoring three letter agencies) meant to help them show more relevant ads. And if you have a set advertising budget, you will go to Google because Google will show your ad to the best matching people. That is all Google does to make money. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/030416/googles-6-most-profitable-lines-business-googl.asp
In fact, the article states exactly what I said, and I said that before even finding the link .My guess is that YouTube is clamping down on content because they want to be like reddit, where people pay them to promote their videos while not making it obvious it's an ad. Basically, types of services where someone makes a video and they want it exposed to many people, so YouTube theoretically gets paid to push specific videos for clients. I don't have any proof this is happening, though I have seen clearly unrelated videos show up in YouTube feeds on several accounts, ones not even owned by me. I suspect YouTube is tightening their rules so the people who (probably) are buying these promoted video spots in search do not have their videos show up next to things they don't want to be associated with.
satisfyinghump ago
Whenever someone tries using a current payment processor, they feeeze transactions. Then they try making their own payment processor, sowmthing other then cryptocurrencies, and they fail because the govt and creditcard co. Go after them.
Im not saying all this as an excuse to gove up. Just stating why its taking awhile.
Neongreen ago
Anything we could build on ETH would be cool. Perhaps with a browser plug in you toggle on and off. I know there are a few getting started but they have the ability to pull down dontent.
andrew_jackson ago
Russian Hosting companies aren't that bad.
Neongreen ago
I host all my sites in Pakistan (in business for over 10 years) actually. I've had zero down time and its cheap as fuck. I tried a few resellers that were using AWS and it was constantly fucked up.
P33psh04h ago
Isn't hosting overseas slow?
Neongreen ago
My main business focuses on the Asian Market. It depends on what your doing. It loads and I have compression on everything. It's was like $87 for 3 years. I went with them because very few providers issue free ssl for my sites.
aaronC ago
That's what a CDN is for.
Neongreen ago
Yeah and I'm not hosting any content that's subversive it's all normi stuff.
thatguyiam ago
The other problem is the deep fucking state harassing/murdering anyone involved in providing platforms to those they don't deem fit.
Neongreen ago
Well man I don't know what do anymore. I can't live with myself if I don't try. Atleast you get a buy out option normally before they kill you.
andrew_jackson ago
Yeah, it baffles me that Amazon is in any wise viewed as a quality service. They get hacked constantly, they're inflexible, they're expensive and they crash all the time. How can anyone see them as quality? Their reputation baffles me.
ThinkAboutIt1488 ago
AWS comes off as expensive. I used to think the only reason to use the aws cloud is to keep the costs of ramping up low and meet the demands of doing so quickly as you don't have to deal with hardware issues. However there are so many providers out there that anything can be turned into a 'cloud' with a few lines of code and sftp.
Zestyclose_Marketing ago
Hollywood propaganda made Amazon number one advertised
My_Name_is_Not_Sure ago
The company I work for is very strict with security but has no problem using google products... yeah.
Neongreen ago
Isn't that fucking mind blowing. I've been going through the arduous process of changing all my email to my private email server.
They did what I always knew they would. Made tech so easy for people then flipped the script and started fucking us when we had relaxed.
Wonder_Boy ago
Wait until the "internet of things" is mostly adopted and mature. Frightening. China's social credit network on roids.
fightknightHERO ago
it's only a matter of time before she drops the J bomb
i watched her Meincraft stream and that GloboHomo Israeli flag was a clear indication she's J-woke
TheDonaldTrump ago
You didn't catch that Jew pendant in her FBI video?
James_Grace88 ago
Did you catch that line in her video?
"I am against all forms of antisemitism... After all, you wouldn't want to be labelled a NAZI, now would you? (-:"
MrDarkWater ago
She has, but apparently she's been scared to really go hard for fear of being taken down as well as seen as crazy.
hatecrime ago
Meinkraft
that's so funny
prairie ago
Mein
KraftKraftRothbard_Block_Hoppe ago
she's obviously very anti- jew and muslim, hopefully she drops a anti-jew video soon tho. That would be epic.
Neongreen ago
Yeah and by the fucking way I want the word woke back. It use to mean you took so many red pills you were a lazer autistic. When did those cunts get there hands on it.
TwooPsy ago
Woke started out as a nigger word and was appropriated by our kind.
fightknightHERO ago
definitely agreed, woke was /ourword/
wolfsktaag ago
no, it was a nigger SJW expression from 2012/2013
Myan ago
she has I believe on stream in minecraft (the game she streams)
oyy_veyy_goyy ago
She mentioned it a couple of times in some of her live streams, but still didn't blame ALL jews. I think she'll get there eventually. Also, in her meinkraft streams you might catch her destroying the flag of israel every now and then. In her latest one the flag had a modified version where it was a rainbow flag with the star of david, so that was amusing to see.
Myan ago
yeah she a sweet kid, she just throws her opinion out from what she reads which is totally fine. But in reality, it shows you the extent that youtube will go to silence dissent. a 14 year young girl who live streams minecraft? for fucks sake.
i dont blame all jews either, i blame the family of jews that try to control. a person cannot be held responsible how they are born.
thats what i heard too, let her grow imo
Killeratlarge ago
pull the plug
Rothbard_Block_Hoppe ago
OY VEY, the GOYIM KNOW!!!
BentAxel ago
You Jokers do realize, she's a puppet? Just like AOC except she may be more articulate.
BO2 ago
I very much doubt it. She's like 14 so I'm a lot less worried about her anyway
Rothbard_Block_Hoppe ago
go back to twitter joe
Neongreen ago
You fucking IDF cunt, get off my platform.
BentAxel ago
Fuck off niggerfaggot. Suck my cock and like it.
Neongreen ago
I'd only like it if it's your cock and I get to bite it off so you can't make more kike babies.
BentAxel ago
Such a faggot. Swallow Bitch. Swallow. Good bitch.
Protostorm216 ago
Oy vey, she's just a shill goyim.
tanukihat ago
Don't listen to her, goyim! She'll fill your cattle heads with lies! Here, have some nice Late Night Jimmy Kimmel content, that's what you want. Sleeeeeeep, sleeeeep goyim.
fightknightHERO ago
your shilling is too obvious
anyone who mentions AOC out of the blue IS A SHILL
Myan ago
bentaxel is legit
carlip ago
Any who doesn't call her Sandy Cortes is a shill
fightknightHERO ago
i just call her crazy spic Jewess https://files.catbox.moe/0hkfgc.jpeg
carlip ago
You're retarded if believe that after her interview when she says that Jews are occupiers in Palestine.
fightknightHERO ago
Bro... she's just a puppet of ZOG
she's actually a Sephradi Jew, the whole palistian talk... is simply to get the goyim associate Palestinians with Socialism https://files.catbox.moe/ula68c.png
carlip ago
Lol you actually think netanyahu is a globalist?
fightknightHERO ago
He obviously isp
Zestyclose_Marketing ago
Sigh when will you learn that all politicians are globalists shills even the ones who want to can immigrant s are still letting then in by mass
BentAxel ago
Is that the new name for her? How about Tit's McGee?
Myan ago
she really isnt, if you watch her streams she will let out bombs from time to time. I thought the same too
BentAxel ago
I've watched a couple. That girl is WAY TOO articulate for a 28 year old. No way is she doing that herself. On the Chan they noticed she outed herself on a podcast. Couldn't answer some questions. I didn't hear it, Im just going off what i've heard.
Myan ago
she is tho, like.. i thought too that she was being coached. but really isnt. Watching a couple of her streams, she is that articulate.28 year old? huh.... shes like 14
2: its way different than making a video with a script and rehearsed than live impromptu. she probaby just brain farted out of being nervous.
look, im sitting here defending her as some that worships her. I just saying I felt the same way as you did. And, I found out I was wrong. watching a couple of her streams its obvious she has a head on her shoulders and is I would say a sweet kid.
BentAxel ago
That's my point. I realize she is way younger. Most Millennials aren't as articulate as her. When I say most, I know two or three that have Masters degrees that can talk at that level.
Whoever, whatever. The language has "Them" Scared. Scared as fuck. They want to close that down and not let anything out as it might change one mind.
Myan ago
a lot of little kids are like this tho, they dont watch MSM. she just happens to be a youtuber. and she is not a millenial, she would be what you would call gen-z
i dont know, im just going to drop it. Its basically a cute kid that has interest in current politics
I'll shoot you a pm when shes able to live stream again, i really dont watch them. but it just pops in my feed... and quite honestly its a first amendment issue
TheGrandMaster ago
Wasn't there something about her having a partial Jewish heritage?
BentAxel ago
I missed that.
TheGrandMaster ago
Could be a rumour honestly
tomdogg ago
I’m so in love with her. I wish I could adopt her and raise her as my own kid. Maybe she will be my daughter in law one day.
fightknightHERO ago
Dude... pedo much?
talmoridor-x ago
Project much? Why does it have to be sexual love?
tomdogg ago
Storge, not Eros.
Coffee_BR ago
Yeah, if fags don't even know what the butt is for, how they're going to learn to run companies?
Maroonsaint ago
Butts have lots of functions. But you should eat your vegetables so you can poop good. It comes out rock hard and clean. How often do you have to wipe your ass? I guarantee it’s too often. Trust me. Also when an older woman ties you up and fucks you with a strap on. She calls you a faggot tells you to moan and slaps you across the face and on the ass. She pretends to be your mother. Also you can stick drugs up your butt it’s like banging(needles) as far as it jumps it straight into your blood stream. I almost did it once with amphetamines but I just....i just couldn’t do it. It’s weird. Maybe with coke one day. Iv figures out once your nose gets clogged and fucked up you just take some toss it in some water it liquifies then you can rail it like that which granted isn’t as fun but it keeps your high a-rollin.
Omnidempotent ago
Your (((scatophilia))) betrays you
Maroonsaint ago
I don’t like shit or piss you weirdo. What you never kissed a girl before. Same shit. You’re just being lame. Why can’t I be into what I’m into
Omnidempotent ago
Because it is degenerate, Moshe.
Maroonsaint ago
You gonna downvoat me and run. What a bitch. Come put me in my place fucker
Maroonsaint ago
You know the more you insult me the more I like it. Can you get meaner
8_billion_eaters ago
You sick fuck. You sound like HPOP reincarnated. Have an up vote.
Maroonsaint ago
She’s bent over you spitting in your mouth. God damnit. She used to be my dentist you believe that. All those years I was underage laid out on the table. She’s bent over me her tits dangling in my face and I’m getting hard but how am I supposed to cover that up. I wonder if she saw it and loved it. 15 16 17 year old me turned up and numbed up. Was one fun New Year’s Eve.