I can't stand by and watch stuff like this happen around here. I will not support subverses (by featuring them or making them defaults) with moderators who impose questionable rules such as "your post has to end with a questionmark". Moderators need to calm their tits and focus on nurturing and growing their communities. Rules can always be bent and what better time to bend the rules then now, while Voat is still growing and under development?
I am thankful for moderators who help keep Voat spam-free and I respect your work. I really do. I started working on automoderator for comments and submissions and your job will be made much easier when this is implemented, but for the time being, moderators need to relax and focus on removing spam and eventual illegal content. If I submit a new post and it gains some traction (hundreds of comments, views and upvoats), and my post gets removed because I broke a rule by forgetting to include a question mark in my submission title... well, I would be pissed. People take removal of their comments and submissions very seriously and moderators must think twice before removing stuff if they want to avoid offending users. Voat has a ranking process where time acts as gravity and older posts will eventually fall off the frontpage. Voat also has automatic public moderation logs and everything you remove will still be visible in these modlogs and your actions may be questioned by the community, just like what happened yesterday.
This action can be reverted if /askvoat mods can convince us that the issue has been dealt with or if some other, less restrictive community takes over.
view the rest of the comments →
TimberWolfAlpha ago
Then why call it "Social" justice? Why not just support Justice? What good do you do by cozying up to a loaded term? It's like people who support equality for all, but stay attached to the term "feminsim" rather than adopting the more sensible egalitarianism. I just don't get it.
You can't take a passive defense against authoritarianism. And you yourself seem to admit the generous overlap between the "SJW" community and authoritarianism of a stripe. So why do you advocate for letting our guard down? All that will do is make it easier for them.
I'm not saying that I ought to be trusted with moderator power in a popular subverse anymore than an ardent SJW should. In a popular default, the goal ought to be neutral, impartial mods. Not pretending it's okay for EITHER a FSW or SJW to steer the ship. or any other stringent ideology. And if someone of such a stripe DOES get into a position like that, the burden is on THEM to demonstrate impartiality. To recuse themselves and leave issues that might be seen as conflicts of interest to another mod. To avoid being petty and robotic in their moderation actions. I want ANYONE whose impartiality is in question to be rigorously scrutinized.