I can't stand by and watch stuff like this happen around here. I will not support subverses (by featuring them or making them defaults) with moderators who impose questionable rules such as "your post has to end with a questionmark". Moderators need to calm their tits and focus on nurturing and growing their communities. Rules can always be bent and what better time to bend the rules then now, while Voat is still growing and under development?
I am thankful for moderators who help keep Voat spam-free and I respect your work. I really do. I started working on automoderator for comments and submissions and your job will be made much easier when this is implemented, but for the time being, moderators need to relax and focus on removing spam and eventual illegal content. If I submit a new post and it gains some traction (hundreds of comments, views and upvoats), and my post gets removed because I broke a rule by forgetting to include a question mark in my submission title... well, I would be pissed. People take removal of their comments and submissions very seriously and moderators must think twice before removing stuff if they want to avoid offending users. Voat has a ranking process where time acts as gravity and older posts will eventually fall off the frontpage. Voat also has automatic public moderation logs and everything you remove will still be visible in these modlogs and your actions may be questioned by the community, just like what happened yesterday.
This action can be reverted if /askvoat mods can convince us that the issue has been dealt with or if some other, less restrictive community takes over.
view the rest of the comments →
SpaceRosa ago
There are certain things most people agree makes someone a good or bad moderator. To be a good one, you have to be reasonably intelligent. You have to be able to consider the needs of the subverse as they change, and come up with appropriate responses when necessary. You need to have patience, and know the right words to use. Strictly speaking, two different sentences can mean exactly the same thing, but if you use the wrong words people will misinterpret what you say, and that's no good.
I don't thin you, or the people sharing your argument, actually have a very high opinion of moderators. I think you're wrong to. It's not as simple as just being a mod and clicking some boxes when someone breaks the rules. If it were, then what was all that crap with She about? That's all she did, stick to the rules to the letter. If that's all it takes, is that not good moderation?