I can't stand by and watch stuff like this happen around here. I will not support subverses (by featuring them or making them defaults) with moderators who impose questionable rules such as "your post has to end with a questionmark". Moderators need to calm their tits and focus on nurturing and growing their communities. Rules can always be bent and what better time to bend the rules then now, while Voat is still growing and under development?
I am thankful for moderators who help keep Voat spam-free and I respect your work. I really do. I started working on automoderator for comments and submissions and your job will be made much easier when this is implemented, but for the time being, moderators need to relax and focus on removing spam and eventual illegal content. If I submit a new post and it gains some traction (hundreds of comments, views and upvoats), and my post gets removed because I broke a rule by forgetting to include a question mark in my submission title... well, I would be pissed. People take removal of their comments and submissions very seriously and moderators must think twice before removing stuff if they want to avoid offending users. Voat has a ranking process where time acts as gravity and older posts will eventually fall off the frontpage. Voat also has automatic public moderation logs and everything you remove will still be visible in these modlogs and your actions may be questioned by the community, just like what happened yesterday.
This action can be reverted if /askvoat mods can convince us that the issue has been dealt with or if some other, less restrictive community takes over.
view the rest of the comments →
TheKillerRabbit ago
We need to institute a system where the subscribers can elect/kick out mods through voting. Subs turn to shit when mods are allowed to go unchecked for their actions. Thank you Atko for showing us that you don't take kindly to mod abuse.
SpaceRosa ago
And how do you stop it turning into a popularity contest? Worse, how do you make sure the better mod comes out on top and not the mod who panders to whatever the circlejerk/popular attitudes are at the time? You'd never see a more liberal moderator voted in by people on this website, even if they were absolutely the most fit for the job. People are too quick to associate that with thier boogeyman SJWs.
TheKillerRabbit ago
In the long term, it is better to have a democracy than an authoritarian regime simply due to the fact that you can vote the shitty people out. I'm not saying we let everyone vote. Just people who have garnered a certain amount of CCP, who therefore have some credibility in that sub. The fact that transparent modlogs exist, and that these elections could happen anytime, means mods are constantly in the danger of getting voted out of office if they show abuse.
cfl1 ago
How are you going to deal with the obvious possibility of hostile takeovers, where outsiders flood in, vote, but have no interest (or an opposing interest) in the sub's community?
This would make brigading incredibly dangerous and powerful.
TheKillerRabbit ago
Voat already has a minimum downvote cap for CCP. I say that we should have an upvote cap and then let each sub decide for itself who gets to vote.
weezkitty ago
That wouldn't prevent a long con though
TheKillerRabbit ago
There really is no perfect system. But authoritarian style modding is much more easier to abuse than a democracy style system.
weezkitty ago
No perfect system for sure. Either way could got ugly. I would be okay with it if it is only initiated by an admin after complaints