I can't stand by and watch stuff like this happen around here. I will not support subverses (by featuring them or making them defaults) with moderators who impose questionable rules such as "your post has to end with a questionmark". Moderators need to calm their tits and focus on nurturing and growing their communities. Rules can always be bent and what better time to bend the rules then now, while Voat is still growing and under development?
I am thankful for moderators who help keep Voat spam-free and I respect your work. I really do. I started working on automoderator for comments and submissions and your job will be made much easier when this is implemented, but for the time being, moderators need to relax and focus on removing spam and eventual illegal content. If I submit a new post and it gains some traction (hundreds of comments, views and upvoats), and my post gets removed because I broke a rule by forgetting to include a question mark in my submission title... well, I would be pissed. People take removal of their comments and submissions very seriously and moderators must think twice before removing stuff if they want to avoid offending users. Voat has a ranking process where time acts as gravity and older posts will eventually fall off the frontpage. Voat also has automatic public moderation logs and everything you remove will still be visible in these modlogs and your actions may be questioned by the community, just like what happened yesterday.
This action can be reverted if /askvoat mods can convince us that the issue has been dealt with or if some other, less restrictive community takes over.
view the rest of the comments →
Lifelonghabit ago
So why is @she still being allowed to mod /v/AskVoat or any sub for that matter? People like her taking over are the reason we all left reddit in the first place. Surely @Atko and @PutItOut have the power to strip her of mod privileges.
gurlat ago
Because Atko doesn't want to start removing mods. He doesn't want to interfere in the activities of individual subverses.
It sets a precedent, if he removes @she now, next time a group of users have a problem with a mod, does he have to step in an fix that? and the next time etc.
What if only half the users in a sub have a problem with a mod? Does Atko have to choose sides, and potentially piss off the other half?
But just because he's choosing not to directly intervene in the activities of a specific subverse, doesn't mean he can't strongly express his disapproval of their behaviour.
Lifelonghabit ago
You make some very good points there, thank you.