You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

TheKillerRabbit ago

We need to institute a system where the subscribers can elect/kick out mods through voting. Subs turn to shit when mods are allowed to go unchecked for their actions. Thank you Atko for showing us that you don't take kindly to mod abuse.

SpaceRosa ago

And how do you stop it turning into a popularity contest? Worse, how do you make sure the better mod comes out on top and not the mod who panders to whatever the circlejerk/popular attitudes are at the time? You'd never see a more liberal moderator voted in by people on this website, even if they were absolutely the most fit for the job. People are too quick to associate that with thier boogeyman SJWs.

goatboy ago

Why would we want to stop it from becoming a popularity contest? People become popular because they have support. People with community support should be given a chance to lead.

SpaceRosa ago

Just because they're popular doesn't mean they're going to be good mods.

goatboy ago

What does that even mean? On voat, Mods are inglorious janitors. Reddit is the place where mods are allowed to have delusions of grandeur.

SpaceRosa ago

It means what it says. Popularity is not the same thing as ability or skill or knowledge. You can be the most loved on the whole website, but that doesn't determine whether or not you would do well as a moderator.

goatboy ago

There is no skill required... at all.

If a mod ever has any doubt about what to do, the answer is always: Do nothing, the votes will figure it out.

Only idiots worry: bu, bu, but whut 'bout muh rulz?!

SpaceRosa ago

No. You have to have understanding, and you have to know how to engage with your userbase. You have to know when is necessary to take action, and when to hold off. You have to know what's appropriate according to the subverse's needs at changes. These things take skill and thinking to get just right.

goatboy ago

Nope. Literally no skills required.