I can't stand by and watch stuff like this happen around here. I will not support subverses (by featuring them or making them defaults) with moderators who impose questionable rules such as "your post has to end with a questionmark". Moderators need to calm their tits and focus on nurturing and growing their communities. Rules can always be bent and what better time to bend the rules then now, while Voat is still growing and under development?
I am thankful for moderators who help keep Voat spam-free and I respect your work. I really do. I started working on automoderator for comments and submissions and your job will be made much easier when this is implemented, but for the time being, moderators need to relax and focus on removing spam and eventual illegal content. If I submit a new post and it gains some traction (hundreds of comments, views and upvoats), and my post gets removed because I broke a rule by forgetting to include a question mark in my submission title... well, I would be pissed. People take removal of their comments and submissions very seriously and moderators must think twice before removing stuff if they want to avoid offending users. Voat has a ranking process where time acts as gravity and older posts will eventually fall off the frontpage. Voat also has automatic public moderation logs and everything you remove will still be visible in these modlogs and your actions may be questioned by the community, just like what happened yesterday.
This action can be reverted if /askvoat mods can convince us that the issue has been dealt with or if some other, less restrictive community takes over.
view the rest of the comments →
TheRedditExodus ago
I messaged she with the suggestion to reword the rule so that titles must clearly be questions. I believe this would solve the issues that have flooded this site in the form of memes and threads for the last day.
weezkitty ago
Although rewording would help. Less rigidity is key
TheRedditExodus ago
And I think the rewording would help that. Having a rule as rigid as "posts must have a?" leaves no option for leeway.
ASacrificialHerring ago
The rule doesn't even say that:
Most of the posts that were unfairly removed did contain a question in their titles.
TheRedditExodus ago
I guess I just assumed that it meant a "?" as it's in quotes. They could literally just delete the "?" and it'd be fine.
ASacrificialHerring ago
Yes, that's an amusing thing about the situation. It's fairly clear the rule means there should be a question mark and /u/she takes the spirit of it, but then deletes posts that are clearly in the spirit of /v/askvoat.