Voat prohibits the posting of sexualized media of minors (under the age of 18) or any media depicting minors in sexual situations. Your account will be immediately and permanently banned.
I mean, stuff like drawings may or may not depict a child, but who is decide if the person in the drawing is a minor? If it's only concerning real life individuals, than I'm for it.
Sorry but v/loli offers nothing of value to the community, toddlers and small children particularly, even drawn, in sexualized scenarios is of no use, causes controversy, grosses people out, and brings allot of unwanted negative attention to everyone here from the creators to the participants.
Besides, isn't there a site or two dedicated to such like Deviant Art? This site is about maintaining free speech and open dialog, not seeing who can be sexually enticed by images that are clearly meant to resemble toddlers or small children.
Look at all the pedos in this thread .... fucking unreal... and this from a 'community' that hates muslims so much because they are pedos .... pot meet kettle.
Seems pretty solid to me. Look through this thread, you can't tell me grown men are looking at photos of little girls because they like the 'fashion' .... it's a sexual thing plain and simple, which boils down to pedo shit.
Loli content is literally a victimless crime, and not even a crime, at that, which just makes it victimless. You're trying to pull guilt by association. And you still haven't explained why cartoons are protected under the 1st Amendment, if you want to claim they aren't protected speech.
I never said anything about protected speech, free speech or otherwise, I just said they're pedos.... which is pretty clear. I haven't called for anything to be banned, just saying, they're pedos... when you are looking at pictures of kids for sexual pleasure, cartoon or not, it's pedophilia. Call it what it is.
So what? The lolicons aren't hurting anyone except themselves. What do you care if a bunch of losers want to sit around jerking it to lines on paper instead of going out and finding themselves a real woman?
So I can't call them pedos ? ... does their harming someone directly have something to do with what I can say to them ? They get upset being called pedos but it's exactly what they are. As I'm sure you are well aware free speech doesn't protect anyone from being called out, it just means you won't be arrested or silenced. If they don't like being called pedos then they shouldn't do pedo shit.
You enter a discussion thread about implementation of rules, namely whether or not to ban certain content, and then you want to complain when your comments get viewed in that context.
I see, so you're just a troll, then. What's the matter, CTR not paying you enough, now that the election is over and those Soros-bucks have dried up?
Everyone who disagrees with you is a shill, paid, or a troll right . . . makes perfect sense. I didn't complain about anything, I just clarified what I meant.
view the rest of the comments →
7584145? ago
Disagree with this:
I mean, stuff like drawings may or may not depict a child, but who is decide if the person in the drawing is a minor? If it's only concerning real life individuals, than I'm for it.
7584328? ago
Sorry but v/loli offers nothing of value to the community, toddlers and small children particularly, even drawn, in sexualized scenarios is of no use, causes controversy, grosses people out, and brings allot of unwanted negative attention to everyone here from the creators to the participants.
Besides, isn't there a site or two dedicated to such like Deviant Art? This site is about maintaining free speech and open dialog, not seeing who can be sexually enticed by images that are clearly meant to resemble toddlers or small children.
7588853? ago
Look at all the pedos in this thread .... fucking unreal... and this from a 'community' that hates muslims so much because they are pedos .... pot meet kettle.
7594212? ago
Ad hominem and appeal to hypocrisy fallacies are not arguments.
7599680? ago
It's not an 'argument' it's a statement.
7599752? ago
FTFY.
7599848? ago
Seems pretty solid to me. Look through this thread, you can't tell me grown men are looking at photos of little girls because they like the 'fashion' .... it's a sexual thing plain and simple, which boils down to pedo shit.
7600079? ago
Loli content is literally a victimless crime, and not even a crime, at that, which just makes it victimless. You're trying to pull guilt by association. And you still haven't explained why cartoons are protected under the 1st Amendment, if you want to claim they aren't protected speech.
7600222? ago
I never said anything about protected speech, free speech or otherwise, I just said they're pedos.... which is pretty clear. I haven't called for anything to be banned, just saying, they're pedos... when you are looking at pictures of kids for sexual pleasure, cartoon or not, it's pedophilia. Call it what it is.
7600295? ago
So what? The lolicons aren't hurting anyone except themselves. What do you care if a bunch of losers want to sit around jerking it to lines on paper instead of going out and finding themselves a real woman?
7600362? ago
So I can't call them pedos ? ... does their harming someone directly have something to do with what I can say to them ? They get upset being called pedos but it's exactly what they are. As I'm sure you are well aware free speech doesn't protect anyone from being called out, it just means you won't be arrested or silenced. If they don't like being called pedos then they shouldn't do pedo shit.
7600448? ago
You enter a discussion thread about implementation of rules, namely whether or not to ban certain content, and then you want to complain when your comments get viewed in that context.
I see, so you're just a troll, then. What's the matter, CTR not paying you enough, now that the election is over and those Soros-bucks have dried up?
7600558? ago
Everyone who disagrees with you is a shill, paid, or a troll right . . . makes perfect sense. I didn't complain about anything, I just clarified what I meant.
Looks like I found one of the pedos.....
7600869? ago
Nah, just an advocate for free speech that mistook someone who just wanted to call names for someone having a serious discussion about the site.