New Proposed Site-Wide Rules (announcements)
submitted 8.2 years ago by 1557385?
view the rest of the comments →
7585032? 8.2 years ago
If the discussions are kept open and honest like this then that can be addressed later as well.
7587605? 8.2 years ago
No, that needs to be addressed first. It's a fundamental flaw of the proposal and if it can't be solved (and I don't see how it could be) then it shouldn't be implemented.
7590921? 8.2 years ago
The proposal is to put forward solutions to the listed problems. What are yours?
7594564? 8.2 years ago
Status quo, migrations work fine.
The problem is that these aren't actually solutions, they create new dangers.
7594585? 8.2 years ago
Alright, I see your point then.
view the rest of the comments →
7585032? ago
If the discussions are kept open and honest like this then that can be addressed later as well.
7587605? ago
No, that needs to be addressed first. It's a fundamental flaw of the proposal and if it can't be solved (and I don't see how it could be) then it shouldn't be implemented.
7590921? ago
The proposal is to put forward solutions to the listed problems. What are yours?
7594564? ago
Status quo, migrations work fine.
The problem is that these aren't actually solutions, they create new dangers.
7594585? ago
Alright, I see your point then.