Voat prohibits the posting of sexualized media of minors (under the age of 18) or any media depicting minors in sexual situations. Your account will be immediately and permanently banned.
I mean, stuff like drawings may or may not depict a child, but who is decide if the person in the drawing is a minor? If it's only concerning real life individuals, than I'm for it.
Sorry but v/loli offers nothing of value to the community, toddlers and small children particularly, even drawn, in sexualized scenarios is of no use, causes controversy, grosses people out, and brings allot of unwanted negative attention to everyone here from the creators to the participants.
Besides, isn't there a site or two dedicated to such like Deviant Art? This site is about maintaining free speech and open dialog, not seeing who can be sexually enticed by images that are clearly meant to resemble toddlers or small children.
Sorry but v/loli offers nothing of value to the community...causes controversy, grosses people out, and brings allot of unwanted negative attention to everyone here from the creators to the participants. Besides, isn't there a site or two dedicated to such like Deviant Art?
Let's try this with a different subject, shall we? A flip of the script, if you will...
Sorry but v/niggers offers nothing of value to the community...causes controversy, offends people, and brings allot of unwanted negative attention to everyone here from the creators to the participants. Besides, isn't there a site or two dedicated to such like Stormfront?
Don't call yourself someone who respects free speech and open dialog, then turn around and advocate censoring speech and discussion you don't like. You'd pitch your shit if it was /v/niggers we were talking about doing this to, but just because it's legal content that you don't like and find disgusting, you'd ban it...you make me sicker than the lolicons do, and that's saying something. And you consider yourself a Voat Goat? Pathetic...
view the rest of the comments →
7584145? ago
Disagree with this:
I mean, stuff like drawings may or may not depict a child, but who is decide if the person in the drawing is a minor? If it's only concerning real life individuals, than I'm for it.
7584328? ago
Sorry but v/loli offers nothing of value to the community, toddlers and small children particularly, even drawn, in sexualized scenarios is of no use, causes controversy, grosses people out, and brings allot of unwanted negative attention to everyone here from the creators to the participants.
Besides, isn't there a site or two dedicated to such like Deviant Art? This site is about maintaining free speech and open dialog, not seeing who can be sexually enticed by images that are clearly meant to resemble toddlers or small children.
7594041? ago
Let's try this with a different subject, shall we? A flip of the script, if you will...
Don't call yourself someone who respects free speech and open dialog, then turn around and advocate censoring speech and discussion you don't like. You'd pitch your shit if it was /v/niggers we were talking about doing this to, but just because it's legal content that you don't like and find disgusting, you'd ban it...you make me sicker than the lolicons do, and that's saying something. And you consider yourself a Voat Goat? Pathetic...