I'm not a fan of the loli content in RFH. However, to my knowledge, loli is still protected as artistic expression under the 1st Amendment, even if it is repugnant. What is Voat's policy re: loli content?
As much as I despise that form of content, I think forming a container-sub for it here, where they're allowed to post it, keeps it off of the rest of the web (And Voat, for that matter) that isn't as welcoming to the lolicons...and it's easy enough for me to block places like RFH to allow them their legal content without me having to see it.
tl;dr - Loli is repugnant, but between censoring legal content and supporting free speech/free expression, I have to come down on the side of free speech/free expression.
view the rest of the comments →
7589592? ago
I'm not a fan of the loli content in RFH. However, to my knowledge, loli is still protected as artistic expression under the 1st Amendment, even if it is repugnant. What is Voat's policy re: loli content?
As much as I despise that form of content, I think forming a container-sub for it here, where they're allowed to post it, keeps it off of the rest of the web (And Voat, for that matter) that isn't as welcoming to the lolicons...and it's easy enough for me to block places like RFH to allow them their legal content without me having to see it.
tl;dr - Loli is repugnant, but between censoring legal content and supporting free speech/free expression, I have to come down on the side of free speech/free expression.