We need a stance on content such as /v/lolicons and /v/ youngladies. While I know many of the users on this site find this content objectionable, we need to know weather it will continue being allowed under the sexualized content rule. To me, this seems like a VERY important line in the sand to be drawn. Regardless of peoples thoughts on this content, both of these subverses produce content that is generally considered legal under US law. Under at least my reading of your proposed rule, these verses would be banned. Doing so, to me at least, seems like a step down a VERY bad looking path. We need an official ruling that can be referenced, a statement on the admins views here.
view the rest of the comments →
7589108? ago
@puttitout @atko.
We need a stance on content such as /v/lolicons and /v/ youngladies. While I know many of the users on this site find this content objectionable, we need to know weather it will continue being allowed under the sexualized content rule. To me, this seems like a VERY important line in the sand to be drawn. Regardless of peoples thoughts on this content, both of these subverses produce content that is generally considered legal under US law. Under at least my reading of your proposed rule, these verses would be banned. Doing so, to me at least, seems like a step down a VERY bad looking path. We need an official ruling that can be referenced, a statement on the admins views here.