doxing. seems obvious. as a recent scottish blogger's info was revealed and he's having to stay low. unless that's fake news i'm unaware of.
community policy. it seems that there is a fine line when some mod or admin suddenly has it in for someone and just bans them for some kind of childish spat. so if there is a policy in place that allows for some kind of process to figure out if a.) is the ban necessary or b.) is there a mod just hatin on a poster, that'd be best case scenario. but for things like science, it might be better for the mod to have some say if for instance the idea of banning anything that doesn't have to do with science from being posted then that makes sense seeing that would be that subverse policy.
catch all policy. free speech. then again, there are times when there is a reason for taking action. but you know, free speech.
sexualized minors. who was it that said they know porn when they see it? is national geographic naked african children okay, but not a naked whtie child playing naked in the park? i've seen beautiful art of naked people of all ages. then again i've seen that show about making children into sexy models on the runway show. which is way worse in my opinion. it's a touchy subject. i don't think i'm lawyer enough to make a coherent statement. just draw a line in the sand and go with that.
view the rest of the comments →
7588832? ago
doxing. seems obvious. as a recent scottish blogger's info was revealed and he's having to stay low. unless that's fake news i'm unaware of.
community policy. it seems that there is a fine line when some mod or admin suddenly has it in for someone and just bans them for some kind of childish spat. so if there is a policy in place that allows for some kind of process to figure out if a.) is the ban necessary or b.) is there a mod just hatin on a poster, that'd be best case scenario. but for things like science, it might be better for the mod to have some say if for instance the idea of banning anything that doesn't have to do with science from being posted then that makes sense seeing that would be that subverse policy.
catch all policy. free speech. then again, there are times when there is a reason for taking action. but you know, free speech.
sexualized minors. who was it that said they know porn when they see it? is national geographic naked african children okay, but not a naked whtie child playing naked in the park? i've seen beautiful art of naked people of all ages. then again i've seen that show about making children into sexy models on the runway show. which is way worse in my opinion. it's a touchy subject. i don't think i'm lawyer enough to make a coherent statement. just draw a line in the sand and go with that.